This document provides comprehensive checklists for each phase of the spec-driven development process. Use these checklists to ensure quality and completeness at each stage.
- Clear Introduction: Feature overview explains the problem and solution
- Business Value: Clear articulation of why this feature is needed
- Scope Definition: What's included and excluded is explicitly stated
- Stakeholder Identification: All relevant stakeholders are identified
- Complete Format: All user stories follow "As a [role], I want [feature], so that [benefit]" format
- Clear Roles: User roles are specific and well-defined
- Valuable Features: Each feature provides clear user value
- Measurable Benefits: Benefits are specific and measurable where possible
- WHEN Statements: Event-driven requirements use WHEN correctly
- IF Statements: Conditional requirements use IF appropriately
- WHILE Statements: Continuous behaviors use WHILE correctly
- WHERE Statements: Context-specific requirements use WHERE appropriately
- SHALL Usage: All system responses use SHALL for mandatory behavior
- Testable: Each criterion can be objectively tested
- Specific: Criteria avoid vague terms like "user-friendly" or "fast"
- Complete: All aspects of the requirement are covered
- Unambiguous: Criteria have only one possible interpretation
- Measurable: Quantitative criteria include specific metrics
- Performance: Response time and throughput requirements specified
- Security: Authentication, authorization, and data protection covered
- Usability: User experience and accessibility requirements included
- Reliability: Error handling and recovery requirements defined
- Scalability: Growth and load requirements addressed
- Logical Grouping: Related requirements are grouped together
- Clear Numbering: Hierarchical numbering system is consistent
- Priority Assignment: Requirements have clear priority levels
- Dependency Mapping: Dependencies between requirements are identified
- All Scenarios Covered: Positive, negative, and edge cases included
- Integration Points: External system interactions are specified
- Data Requirements: Data models and validation rules are defined
- Error Conditions: Error scenarios and handling are documented
- No Conflicts: Requirements don't contradict each other
- Feasibility: Technical feasibility has been considered
- Consistency: Terminology is used consistently throughout
- Traceability: Requirements can be traced to business objectives
- Business Approval: Business stakeholders have reviewed and approved
- Technical Review: Technical team has validated feasibility
- User Validation: End users have provided input where appropriate
- Compliance Check: Regulatory and policy requirements are met
- System Context: How the feature fits into the broader system is clear
- Component Identification: Major components and their responsibilities are defined
- Interface Definition: Interfaces between components are specified
- Technology Choices: Technology stack decisions are justified
- Data Models: Complete data structures with validation rules
- API Specifications: Detailed API endpoints with request/response formats
- Business Logic: Core algorithms and business rules are documented
- Integration Points: External system integrations are detailed
- Modularity: Components are loosely coupled and highly cohesive
- Extensibility: Design supports future enhancements
- Maintainability: Code organization supports easy maintenance
- Reusability: Common patterns and components are identified
- Scalability: Design supports expected load and growth
- Caching Strategy: Appropriate caching mechanisms are planned
- Database Optimization: Query optimization and indexing considered
- Resource Usage: Memory and CPU usage patterns are analyzed
- Authentication: User authentication mechanisms are specified
- Authorization: Access control and permissions are designed
- Data Protection: Encryption and data handling procedures are defined
- Input Validation: Security validation and sanitization are planned
- Error Handling: Comprehensive error handling strategy is defined
- Monitoring: Observability and monitoring approaches are planned
- Recovery: Backup and disaster recovery procedures are considered
- Testing Strategy: Comprehensive testing approach is outlined
- Architecture Diagrams: Clear visual representation of system architecture
- Data Flow Diagrams: How data moves through the system
- Sequence Diagrams: Interaction patterns between components
- State Diagrams: System state transitions where applicable
- API Documentation: Complete API specifications with examples
- Database Schema: Detailed database design with relationships
- Configuration: Environment and deployment configuration requirements
- Dependencies: External libraries and services are documented
- Complete Coverage: All requirements are addressed in the design
- Traceability: Design elements can be traced back to requirements
- Gap Analysis: No requirements are left unaddressed
- Scope Validation: Design stays within defined scope
- Architecture Review: Senior developers have reviewed the architecture
- Security Review: Security team has validated security aspects
- Performance Review: Performance implications have been analyzed
- Integration Review: Integration points have been validated
- Clear Objectives: Each task has a specific, measurable objective
- Appropriate Scope: Tasks are sized for 1-2 days of work
- Logical Sequence: Tasks are ordered to build incrementally
- Dependency Management: Task dependencies are clearly identified
- Acceptance Criteria: Each task has specific completion criteria
- Implementation Notes: Key implementation details are provided
- Testing Requirements: Testing expectations are clearly stated
- Requirements Traceability: Tasks link back to specific requirements
- Foundation Tasks: Setup and infrastructure tasks are included
- Core Logic Tasks: Business logic implementation is covered
- Integration Tasks: System integration work is planned
- Testing Tasks: Comprehensive testing tasks are included
- Documentation Tasks: Documentation updates are planned
- Test-Driven Approach: TDD/BDD strategy is defined where appropriate
- Code Quality Standards: Quality expectations are established
- Review Process: Code review procedures are planned
- Integration Strategy: How components will be integrated is clear
- Technical Risks: Potential technical challenges are identified
- Dependency Risks: External dependency risks are considered
- Resource Risks: Team capacity and skill requirements are assessed
- Timeline Risks: Schedule risks and mitigation strategies are planned
- Testing Strategy: Unit, integration, and E2E testing is planned
- Performance Testing: Performance validation approach is defined
- Security Testing: Security validation procedures are included
- User Acceptance: User validation and feedback processes are planned
- Full Coverage: All design elements are covered by tasks
- No Gaps: No implementation areas are left unaddressed
- Realistic Scope: Task scope is achievable within constraints
- Resource Alignment: Tasks match available team skills and capacity
- Actionable Tasks: Each task can be executed by a developer
- Clear Deliverables: Expected outputs are clearly defined
- Measurable Progress: Task completion can be objectively measured
- Integration Ready: Tasks build toward a cohesive implementation
- Technical Approval: Development team has reviewed and approved tasks
- Business Alignment: Tasks align with business priorities and timeline
- Resource Confirmation: Required resources and skills are available
- Timeline Validation: Task timeline is realistic and achievable
- Terminology: Consistent terminology across all documents
- Formatting: Consistent formatting and structure
- Cross-References: Proper linking between related sections
- Version Control: Document versions are properly managed
- All Phases: Requirements, design, and tasks are all complete
- Traceability: Clear traceability from requirements through tasks
- No Orphans: No requirements without design, no design without tasks
- Validation: All documents have been reviewed and approved
- Clear Navigation: Easy to find and navigate between sections
- Searchable: Documents are organized for easy searching
- Actionable: Information is presented in an actionable format
- Maintainable: Documents can be easily updated and maintained
- Phase Completion: Each phase was completed before moving to the next
- Review Gates: Proper reviews were conducted at each phase
- Stakeholder Involvement: Appropriate stakeholders were engaged
- Change Management: Changes were properly documented and approved
- Requirements Quality: Requirements meet quality standards
- Design Quality: Design addresses all requirements appropriately
- Task Quality: Tasks provide clear implementation roadmap
- Overall Coherence: All documents work together cohesively
- Development Environment: Development environment is set up and tested
- Dependencies: All required dependencies are installed and configured
- Tools: Development tools and IDE are configured properly
- Access: Required system access and permissions are in place
- Role Assignment: Team roles and responsibilities are clear
- Knowledge Transfer: Relevant knowledge has been shared with the team
- Communication: Communication channels and processes are established
- Timeline: Implementation timeline and milestones are agreed upon
- One Task at a Time: Focus on completing one task before starting another
- Acceptance Criteria: Each task meets its defined acceptance criteria
- Code Quality: Code follows established standards and best practices
- Testing: Appropriate tests are written and passing
- Status Updates: Regular progress updates are provided
- Blocker Management: Blockers are identified and addressed promptly
- Quality Monitoring: Code quality metrics are monitored
- Requirement Validation: Implementation is validated against requirements
- All Tasks Complete: All planned tasks have been completed
- Requirements Met: All requirements have been implemented and tested
- Quality Standards: Code meets all quality and performance standards
- Documentation Updated: All documentation has been updated appropriately
- Code Review: Complete code review has been conducted
- Testing Validation: All tests are passing and coverage is adequate
- Performance Validation: Performance requirements are met
- Security Validation: Security requirements are satisfied
- User Acceptance: User acceptance testing has been completed successfully
- Vague Requirements: Break down into more specific, testable criteria
- Missing Stakeholders: Identify and engage all relevant stakeholders
- Scope Creep: Clearly define and communicate scope boundaries
- Conflicting Requirements: Resolve conflicts through stakeholder discussion
- Over-Engineering: Simplify design to meet current requirements
- Under-Specification: Add necessary detail for implementation clarity
- Technology Mismatch: Validate technology choices against requirements
- Integration Complexity: Simplify integration points where possible
- Tasks Too Large: Break down large tasks into smaller, manageable pieces
- Missing Dependencies: Identify and document all task dependencies
- Unclear Objectives: Clarify task objectives and acceptance criteria
- Resource Mismatch: Align tasks with available team skills and capacity
- Requirement Misunderstanding: Refer back to original requirements and design
- Technical Blockers: Escalate technical issues and seek expert help
- Quality Issues: Implement additional testing and code review processes
- Timeline Pressure: Prioritize critical functionality and defer nice-to-haves
- Completeness: Percentage of requirements with complete acceptance criteria
- Testability: Percentage of requirements that are objectively testable
- Traceability: Percentage of requirements traced to business objectives
- Stakeholder Approval: Percentage of requirements approved by stakeholders
- Coverage: Percentage of requirements addressed in design
- Complexity: Cyclomatic complexity of proposed architecture
- Reusability: Number of reusable components identified
- Performance: Estimated performance against requirements
- Task Completion: Percentage of tasks completed on schedule
- Code Quality: Code quality metrics (coverage, complexity, etc.)
- Defect Rate: Number of defects found during implementation
- Requirement Satisfaction: Percentage of requirements fully implemented
- Cycle Time: Time from requirements to implementation completion
- Rework Rate: Percentage of work that required significant rework
- Stakeholder Satisfaction: Stakeholder satisfaction with the process
- Team Velocity: Rate of task completion over time
# Requirements Quick Checklist
## Document Structure
- [ ] Clear introduction and problem statement
- [ ] User stories with roles, features, and benefits
- [ ] EARS-formatted acceptance criteria
- [ ] Non-functional requirements
- [ ] Constraints and assumptions
## Quality Check
- [ ] All requirements are testable
- [ ] No vague or ambiguous language
- [ ] Requirements are prioritized
- [ ] Dependencies are identified
- [ ] All stakeholders have reviewed# Design Quick Checklist
## Document Structure
- [ ] Architecture overview with diagrams
- [ ] Component responsibilities defined
- [ ] Interface specifications
- [ ] Data models and validation rules
- [ ] Error handling strategy
## Quality Check
- [ ] All requirements are addressed
- [ ] Design is modular and maintainable
- [ ] Security considerations included
- [ ] Performance considerations included
- [ ] Technical team has reviewed# Tasks Quick Checklist
## Document Structure
- [ ] Incremental implementation plan
- [ ] Tasks with clear objectives
- [ ] Requirements traceability
- [ ] Testing strategy for each component
- [ ] Dependency management
## Quality Check
- [ ] Tasks are appropriately sized
- [ ] All design elements are covered
- [ ] Tasks build incrementally
- [ ] Implementation risks identified
- [ ] Development team has reviewedTrack the effectiveness of your spec-driven development process:
- Requirements Clarity Score: % of requirements that need no clarification during implementation
- Design Completeness: % of implementation covered by design documentation
- Task Accuracy: % of tasks completed within estimated time
- Change Rate: Number of spec changes per week during implementation
- Time to Implementation: Days from spec approval to feature completion
- Defect Rate: Bugs found per feature compared to baseline
- Rework Percentage: % of code that needs significant revision
- Stakeholder Satisfaction: Survey scores from business stakeholders
- Spec Creation Time: Hours spent on each phase of spec development
- Review Cycle Time: Days from spec submission to approval
- Implementation Velocity: Story points or features completed per sprint
- Knowledge Transfer Success: % of team members who can work on spec'd features
- Baseline First: Measure current performance before implementing specs
- Track Consistently: Use same metrics across all projects
- Review Regularly: Assess metrics monthly and adjust process
- Focus on Trends: Look for improvement over time, not absolute numbers