Improvement: correct architecture elements and modify component template#462
Conversation
|
The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html |
masc2023
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is feature not updated too in this PR, as it is also introduced? Should there not be an relationship between static architectures and components?
I'm on the relation to the code from the safety audit findings. Feature can be added later (small PRs). |
Disagree her, you introduced already the feature type, see your PR, so why not reflecting it directly, and I see no relationship why you should only consider audit findings as argument against it. |
Added feature now ... |
masc2023
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the including of the feature. Let's discuss some general topics tomorrow in the meeting
| :security: YES | ||
| :safety: ASIL_B | ||
| :status: invalid | ||
| :implements: logic_arc_int__feature_name__interface_name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will be clarified in future, if this is correct
📌 Description
Correct architecture elements and modify component template accordingly
🚨 Impact Analysis
✅ Checklist