[daily secrets] Daily Secrets Analysis - 2026-03-16 #21281
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Secrets Analysis Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #21442. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🔐 Daily Secrets Analysis Report
Date: 2026-03-16
Workflow Files Analyzed: 172
Run: §23163421976
📊 Executive Summary
secrets.*referencesgithub.tokenreferencesThe repository maintains 100% security coverage — every compiled workflow has both redaction steps and explicit permission declarations.
🛡️ Security Posture
✅ Redaction System: 172/172 workflows include
redact_secrets.cjs— full coverage✅ Token Cascades: 640 instances of
GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN || GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN || GITHUB_TOKENfallback chains✅ Permission Blocks: 172/172 explicit
permissions:declarations✅ No Secrets in Outputs: Zero instances of secrets exposed via job outputs
✅
github.event.*Usage: All 172 files usegithub.event.*inenv:blocks to pass event context — this is expected, safe workflow behavior (e.g., issue numbers, PR numbers, comment IDs)🎯 Key Findings
GitHub Token Triad Dominates: The top 3 secrets (
GITHUB_TOKEN: 2,025 ·GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN: 1,978 ·GH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKEN: 980) account for 86% of all secret references. These are all GitHub access tokens using the established cascade fallback pattern.AI Engine Secrets Well-Contained: AI engine API keys (
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: 164 ·OPENAI_API_KEY: 90 ·CODEX_API_KEY: 90 ·GEMINI_API_KEY: 4) are present only in the workflows that need them — no evidence of over-provisioning.Specialized Integrations Low Footprint: Third-party service secrets (Sentry, Datadog, Slack, Brave, Notion, Tavily) each appear in ≤15 workflows, confirming appropriate scope isolation.
COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN: Present in 295 references across workflows — this purpose-specific token for Copilot inference is well-separated from the general GitHub token pool.💡 Recommendations
GH_AW_BOT_DETECTION_TOKEN: Only 1 occurrence detected — verify this is intentional and the workflow using it is correctly scoped.AZURE_CLIENT_ID,AZURE_CLIENT_SECRET,AZURE_TENANT_IDeach appear exactly twice — confirm these are in the same workflow and not duplicated unnecessarily.SLACK_BOT_TOKEN: Single occurrence — low risk but ensure the workflow referencing it has minimal permissions.🔑 All Secrets by Usage
GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_TOKENGH_AW_GITHUB_MCP_SERVER_TOKENCOPILOT_GITHUB_TOKENANTHROPIC_API_KEYOPENAI_API_KEYCODEX_API_KEYGH_AW_CI_TRIGGER_TOKENGH_AW_SIDE_REPO_PATTAVILY_API_KEYGH_AW_PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKENNOTION_API_TOKENGH_AW_AGENT_TOKENGEMINI_API_KEYBRAVE_API_KEYDD_SITEDD_APPLICATION_KEYDD_API_KEYSENTRY_OPENAI_API_KEYSENTRY_ACCESS_TOKENCONTEXT7_API_KEYAZURE_TENANT_IDAZURE_CLIENT_SECRETAZURE_CLIENT_IDSLACK_BOT_TOKENGH_AW_BOT_DETECTION_TOKEN📈 Trends
This is the first daily secrets analysis run for this period — no prior baseline available for comparison. Future runs will track:
📖 Reference Documentation
For detailed information about secret usage patterns, see:
actions/setup/js/redact_secrets.cjs.github/workflows/*.lock.ymlReferences:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions