Skip to content

Implement semantics for provisionals #212

@JonatanWaern

Description

@JonatanWaern

Group issue for provisional semantic implementation

In general:

  • We always need to support new syntax for provisionals
  • We should probably warn/error if the new syntax is used without the provisional declaration
  • We do not need to speculatively enforce restrictions imposed by provisionals I don't think, this can probably wait until they are stablized

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No fields configured for Epic.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions