docs: clarify k8s multi-reporter impact on snapshots

[dangrondahl]

Summary

• Reword the "Running multiple reporters" table so the Works? column is a single emoji and the explanation moves to its own column
• Correct the description of what happens with conflicting reporters: snapshots are not deleted; diffs between them just compare unrelated scopes
• Note that the environment history will show artifacts continuously stopping and starting as reporters toggle

Test plan

• mint dev and visually verify the table renders with three columns
• Confirm no broken links via mint broken-links

[claude]

Claude finished @dangrondahl's task in 1m 0s —— View job

---

Review of tutorials/report_k8s_envs.md

• Gather context and read changed files
• Review content for accuracy, style, and conventions
• Post findings

Overall: Clean PR. The factual correction (snapshots are not deleted — diffs just become meaningless) is important, and the 3-column table with the <Warning> callout is a clear improvement over the original. Prior reviewer feedback (emoji → Yes/No, "Works?" → "Supported", Warning callout structure) has been incorporated across the five commits.

No critical issues found.

Convention checks

Check	Result
Relative links	None — all links are root-relative ✓
Navigation entry	No new page added — N/A
Front matter	title and description present ✓
Writing style	Active voice, American spelling, sentence-case heading ✓
Bullet style	Uses * consistently with the rest of the file ✓

Suggestion

Line 176 — "Same as above" is still present. A self-contained phrase ("Separate environments → independent snapshots.") would keep the table scannable without requiring the reader to look up a row. This was suggested in earlier review rounds but hasn't been applied yet.

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
kosli	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Jun 9, 2026, 8:33 AM