As the MCP ecosystem grows, the number of community servers is
expanding rapidly — and with it, the surface area for supply chain
risk. MCP servers can read files, execute commands, and make network
calls on behalf of AI agents, yet there's currently no expectation
that submitters have checked their server for common security issues
before listing it.
A few options worth considering:
- Add a recommended pre-submission checklist item suggesting authors
run a static scan (e.g. npx mcp-customs scan .) before submitting
- Show a security badge alongside community listings so users can
see at a glance whether a server has been audited
- Simply document the risk in the submission guidelines so users
know to check before installing
Not pushing for any specific tool — the goal is just to make
security hygiene a visible part of the submission culture before
the ecosystem gets large enough that it becomes a real problem.
Happy to help draft any of the above if useful.
As the MCP ecosystem grows, the number of community servers is
expanding rapidly — and with it, the surface area for supply chain
risk. MCP servers can read files, execute commands, and make network
calls on behalf of AI agents, yet there's currently no expectation
that submitters have checked their server for common security issues
before listing it.
A few options worth considering:
run a static scan (e.g. npx mcp-customs scan .) before submitting
see at a glance whether a server has been audited
know to check before installing
Not pushing for any specific tool — the goal is just to make
security hygiene a visible part of the submission culture before
the ecosystem gets large enough that it becomes a real problem.
Happy to help draft any of the above if useful.