Before submitting
Area
apps/web
Problem or use case
When moving between multiple threads, or opening settings and returning to a thread, there is no quick way to retrace steps. Numbered thread shortcuts (Cmd+1, Cmd+2, …) help for fixed slots, but they do not help when you have been bouncing across several threads or left a thread for settings and want to land back where you were.
This is a common navigation problem that browsers, VS Code, and Slack already solve with back/forward history.
Proposed solution
Add browser-style back and forward navigation for primary UI locations (threads, settings, and similar views).
UI
- Back and Forward buttons in the app chrome (similar to browser / VS Code / Slack).
- Click to move one step back or forward.
- Hold (long-press) on back/forward to show a history list and jump to a specific entry (same idea as Chrome’s “Click to go back, hold to see history”).
Keybindings
| Shortcut |
Action |
Cmd+[ (macOS) / Ctrl+[ (Windows/Linux) |
Go back |
Cmd+] (macOS) / Ctrl+] (Windows/Linux) |
Go forward |
These match common conventions in VS Code and many other apps.
Example flows
- Thread A → Thread B → Thread C, then
Cmd+[ twice to return to A.
- Open Settings from a thread, then back to the previous thread.
- Hold back to pick an older location from the history stack instead of stepping one-by-one.
Why this matters
Anyone who juggles multiple threads or frequently leaves a thread for settings would navigate faster and with less friction. Back/forward is a small, familiar pattern that reduces sidebar hunting and makes the app feel more like other tools people already use all day.
Smallest useful scope
- Maintain a simple history stack for primary views (at least threads and settings).
- Back/forward buttons +
Cmd+[ / Cmd+] (and Ctrl equivalents).
- Disable buttons when there is nothing in that direction.
- Hold-to-see-history can be a follow-up if needed for v1.
Alternatives considered
- Rely only on
Cmd+1…Cmd+N thread shortcuts — useful for fixed slots, but not for chronological “where I just was” navigation.
- Always use the sidebar to re-select threads — works, but is slower and breaks flow when switching often.
Risks or tradeoffs
- Need a clear rule for what pushes history (e.g. threads and settings yes; ephemeral panels/search maybe no).
- Keybindings should not conflict with existing shortcuts.
- History should probably not grow unbounded or retain stale/deleted threads awkwardly.
Examples or references
Comparable patterns:
- Browsers (back/forward + hold for history)
- VS Code
- Slack
Chrome-style control:
“Click to go back, hold to see history”
Contribution
Before submitting
Area
apps/web
Problem or use case
When moving between multiple threads, or opening settings and returning to a thread, there is no quick way to retrace steps. Numbered thread shortcuts (
Cmd+1,Cmd+2, …) help for fixed slots, but they do not help when you have been bouncing across several threads or left a thread for settings and want to land back where you were.This is a common navigation problem that browsers, VS Code, and Slack already solve with back/forward history.
Proposed solution
Add browser-style back and forward navigation for primary UI locations (threads, settings, and similar views).
UI
Keybindings
Cmd+[(macOS) /Ctrl+[(Windows/Linux)Cmd+](macOS) /Ctrl+](Windows/Linux)These match common conventions in VS Code and many other apps.
Example flows
Cmd+[twice to return to A.Why this matters
Anyone who juggles multiple threads or frequently leaves a thread for settings would navigate faster and with less friction. Back/forward is a small, familiar pattern that reduces sidebar hunting and makes the app feel more like other tools people already use all day.
Smallest useful scope
Cmd+[/Cmd+](and Ctrl equivalents).Alternatives considered
Cmd+1…Cmd+Nthread shortcuts — useful for fixed slots, but not for chronological “where I just was” navigation.Risks or tradeoffs
Examples or references
Comparable patterns:
Chrome-style control:
Contribution