Treat explicit clusters as atomic aggregates#386
Merged
SoundBlaster merged 1 commit intoMay 16, 2026
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
member_contracts.make next-moveonSG-SPEC-0063/propose_retrospective_refactor.Motivation
SG-SPEC-0063is an intentional realization/observation cluster with four member specs, but the generic atomicity validator treated four blocking children as split pressure.Goals
retrospective_refactor_candidatefor explicit cluster aggregates while preserving atomicity pressure for ordinary broad hubs.atomicity_max_blocking_childrenthreshold or changing canonical spec topology.Changes
tools/supervisor.py.specification.member_contractsunder acluster_contract.Validation
Commands run:
Results:
3 passed, 604 deselectedSG-SPEC-0063check:atomicity [],signals [],actions [], observationhealthy_multi_child_aggregatemake backlog:entry_countdropped from97to31;SG-SPEC-0063health item disappearedmake next-move: now recommends proposal0021reobservation instead ofSG-SPEC-0063ruffandcompileallpassed607 passed in 291.52sRisks / Notes
specification.cluster_contractplusspecification.member_contracts; informal prose-only clusters are not exempt.Checklist