Skip to content

Register proposal 0012 runtime realization#392

Merged
SoundBlaster merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/proposal-0012-runtime-registry
May 16, 2026
Merged

Register proposal 0012 runtime realization#392
SoundBlaster merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/proposal-0012-runtime-registry

Conversation

@SoundBlaster
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • What changed? Registered Proposal 0012 as runtime-realized by the existing pending-review staging and freshness-check runtime.
  • Link related issue/task (if any): make next-move selected Proposal 0012 / runtime_realization after Register proposal 0011 runtime realization #391.

Motivation

  • Why is this change needed? True review barrier mechanics already exist in supervisor runtime, but Proposal 0012 was still reported as lacking runtime realization.
  • What problem, gap, or user need does it address? Removes stale proposal runtime pressure and lets the graph advance to the next backlog item.

Goals

  • What should this PR achieve? Mark Proposal 0012 runtime, validation, and observation coverage as complete.
  • What is intentionally out of scope? No change to review-gate behavior and no canonical spec mutation.

Changes

  • Added Proposal 0012 to tools/proposal_runtime_registry.json with pending-review staging, digest/freshness, and accepted-canonical markers.
  • Added a focused regression asserting Proposal 0012 has no remaining runtime next gap.

Validation

  • Tests added/updated for changed behavior
  • Local checks passed

Commands run:

python3 -m pytest -q tests/test_supervisor.py -k 'proposal_0012 or proposal_0011 or proposal_runtime_index or review_pending or resolve_gate_approve'
git diff --check
python3 -m json.tool tools/proposal_runtime_registry.json >/dev/null
make backlog
make next-move

Results:

  • Focused tests: 18 passed, 595 deselected.
  • Backlog after this slice: entry_count = 27, runtime_realization = 18.
  • Next move advances from Proposal 0012 to Proposal 0013 / runtime_realization.
  • Pre-commit hooks passed during commit.

Risks / Notes

  • Backward compatibility impact: none; registry metadata and regression only.
  • Migration/config changes required: none.
  • Known limitations: the next proposal runtime backlog item is Proposal 0013.

Checklist

  • PR title clearly describes the change
  • Scope is focused and minimal
  • Documentation updated (or N/A)
  • No secrets or sensitive data added

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@SoundBlaster SoundBlaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Independent stack review from #390: no blocking findings. I checked the PR-local diff against its stacked base, verified the Proposal 0012 registry entry points at existing pending-review barrier runtime/validation/observation markers, and confirmed the focused proposal runtime tests/checks are green in the stack context.

@SoundBlaster
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Independent stack review from #390: no blocking findings. I checked the PR-local diff against its stacked base, verified the Proposal 0012 registry entry points at existing pending-review barrier runtime/validation/observation markers, and confirmed the focused proposal runtime tests/checks are green in the stack context.

@SoundBlaster SoundBlaster changed the base branch from codex/proposal-0011-runtime-registry to main May 16, 2026 21:39
@SoundBlaster SoundBlaster merged commit 8a93903 into main May 16, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant