-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
[Cosmos][WIP]: Normalize region names passed as preferred or exclude regions. #49090
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jeet1995
wants to merge
14
commits into
Azure:main
Choose a base branch
from
jeet1995:squad/region-name-mapper
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cbde001
Port RegionNameMapper from .NET SDK to normalize region names
jeet1995 2afefb9
Add dynamic region registration from server responses
jeet1995 25a47ea
Fix merge conflict markers left in RegionNameMapper and test
jeet1995 849bcf3
Consolidate RegionNameMapper into RegionNameToRegionIdMap
jeet1995 1d07697
Add integration tests for region name normalization in LocationCache
jeet1995 e668ec4
Add e2e tests for region normalization in ExcludeRegionTests
jeet1995 a5897e9
Add e2e tests for region normalization in availability strategy and PPCB
jeet1995 6083eac
Remove dynamic region registration — pass unknown regions as-is
jeet1995 5b7cd2b
Remove dedupe from setPreferredRegions — let customer misconfig be vi…
jeet1995 d16d101
Fix stale javadoc referencing dynamic registration + add CHANGELOG entry
jeet1995 b6a56c0
Sync canonical region list with LocationNames.cs
jeet1995 5005ced
Sync region ID map with authoritative Settings.xml regionToIdMapping
jeet1995 06351d1
Rename RegionNameToRegionIdMap → RegionUtils, move helpers out of Loc…
jeet1995 71d9f8e
Address PR review comments
jeet1995 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major — Testing ·
TreeSet.iterator().next()makes new FI test order-flakyThis assertion uses
getContactedRegionNames().iterator().next()to assert the first preferred region was contacted. ButCosmosDiagnosticsContext.getContactedRegionNames()returns aTreeSet<String>(verified atCosmosDiagnosticsContext.java:428-429).iterator().next()therefore returns the alphabetically smallest region, not the first-contacted.The test enables
availabilityStrategy(eagerThresholdAvailabilityStrategy)(line ~360 of this method) — so as soon as a 2nd contacted region's name sorts before the first preferred region's, the assertion will false-fail.The kicker: the most recent commit
71d9f8e("Address PR review comments") explicitly fixed this same anti-pattern inPerPartitionCircuitBreakerE2ETests.java(in response to copilot-bot's comment), but did not back-port the fix to this file (added one commit earlier ina5897e9d257).Verification:
Suggested fix — same pattern you used in PPCB: