-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
Non-semantic changes while making my other PR #287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
tallen42
wants to merge
5
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
make-words-better
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
86253b5
make words better
tallen42 dd3b0c9
Consistency with Membership Eval
tallen42 dec59f3
All Eval Process
tallen42 04fa7fb
fix Process
tallen42 40dd27c
It is known that all requirements are to be in standard operating ses…
tallen42 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -261,10 +261,10 @@ \subsection{Modifying the Constitution} | |
| Voting Members are expected to meet the requirements defined in \ref{Expectations of Voting Members}. | ||
|
|
||
| \asubsubsection{Expectations of Active Members} | ||
| Active Members are required to pay dues as stated in \ref{Collection of Dues}, attend all House Meetings and E-Board candidate speeches, and attend at least fifteen of the directorship meetings for each semester in which they are an Active Member. | ||
| Active Members are required to pay dues as stated in \ref{Collection of Dues}, attend all House Meetings and E-Board candidate speeches, and attend at least fifteen directorship meetings for each semester in which they are an Active Member. | ||
| They are also expected to sign a copy of the Membership Agreement. | ||
| \\* \\* | ||
| Active Members must participate in at least one major project during the academic year. | ||
| Active Members must participate in at least one major project. | ||
| Members are required to submit a description for this major project to E-Board for approval. | ||
| As an alternative to this requirement, members may instead assist on a large number of CSH activities and projects. | ||
| However, it is to be understood in advance by the member that this option requires a great deal of participation throughout the year. | ||
|
|
@@ -295,39 +295,39 @@ \subsection{Modifying the Constitution} | |
| \end{enumerate} | ||
|
|
||
| \asubsection{Active Membership Evaluations} | ||
| Active Members are evaluated annually through the Eval Process described below. | ||
| Active Members are evaluated annually through the Membership Evaluation Process. | ||
|
|
||
| % ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP EVALUATIONS | ||
| \asubsubsection{Membership Evaluation} | ||
| The Membership Eval occurs once per academic year, where Active Members are evaluated. | ||
| It is performed as part of the Eval Process that takes place during the spring semester to comply with the RIT Housing deadlines. | ||
| The Membership Eval is responsible for determining individuals who will have the option to continue Active Membership in the following academic year. | ||
| The Eval Process occurs once per academic year, where Active Members are evaluated. | ||
| The Eval Process takes place during the spring semester to comply with the RIT Housing deadlines. | ||
| The Eval Process is responsible for determining individuals who will have the option to continue Active Membership in the following academic year. | ||
| This meeting is open only to Active Members. | ||
| All Active Members are expected to attend this meeting. | ||
|
|
||
| \asubsubsubsection{Voting} | ||
| Any Active Member who has completed all of the requirements as defined in \ref{Expectations of Active Members} at the beginning of the Membership Eval passes their Membership Eval without being voted on. | ||
| All Active Members who have not received an exemption from E-Board prior to the Membership Eval will be evaluated on a member-by-member basis by Active Members. | ||
| The Membership Eval shall hold members to the objective requirements defined in \ref{Expectations of Active Members} and determine which members may continue as an Active Member in the following academic year. | ||
| \asubsubsubsection{Membership Evaluation Voting} | ||
| Any Active Member who has completed all the requirements as defined in \ref{Expectations of Active Members} at the beginning of the Eval Process pass the Eval Process without being voted on. | ||
| All Active Members who have not received an exemption from E-Board prior to the start of the Eval Process will be evaluated on a member-by-member basis by Active Members. | ||
| The Eval Process shall hold members to the objective requirements defined in \ref{Expectations of Active Members} and determine which members may continue as an Active Member in the following academic year. | ||
| Exceptions to the requirements may be made, as attending members may choose any of the outcomes for each member, even if the member being evaluated has not completed all of their requirements. | ||
| These requirements must be completed before the Membership Eval occurs. | ||
| These requirements must be completed before the Eval Process occurs. | ||
| A Secret Immediate Relative Majority vote with two-thirds quorum is required for the evaluation to be valid. | ||
| Neither absentee nor proxy votes are allowed. | ||
|
|
||
| \asubsubsubsection{Membership Evaluation Outcomes} | ||
| Members who pass the Membership Eval have the option to participate as an Active Member in the following year. | ||
| Members who pass the Eval Process have the option to participate as an Active Member in the following year. | ||
| \\* \\* | ||
| If a member fails and has never passed a Membership Eval in the past, their membership will be revoked upon completion of the Membership Eval | ||
| If the member fails, but has previously passed a Membership Eval, they will move to Alumni Membership in bad standing, as defined in \ref{Alumni Membership Selection}, at the end of the Standard Operating Session. | ||
| If a member fails and has never passed an Eval Process in the past, their membership will be revoked upon completion of the Eval Process. | ||
| If the member fails, but has previously passed an Eval Process, they will move to Alumni Membership in bad standing, as defined in \ref{Alumni Membership Selection}, at the end of the Standard Operating Session. | ||
| In either case, the member forfeits their ability to participate as an Active Member in the following year. | ||
| \\* \\* | ||
| A member may be given a conditional to complete as a means of making up for missing requirements. | ||
| A conditional may be proposed by any member present at the Eval. | ||
| If the conditional is approved by the Evals Director, it is then voted on by the attending members as described in \ref{Voting}. | ||
| Each conditional consists of a set of additional requirements and a deadline for completing them. | ||
| Members who are given a conditional have their Eval decision deferred, and therefore maintain their current membership status until the conditional is resolved. | ||
| If the conditional is approved by the Evals Director, it is then voted on by the attending members as described in \ref{Membership Evaluation Voting}. | ||
| Each conditional consists of a set of additional requirements and a deadline to complete them. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "for completing" was better |
||
| Members who are given a conditional have their Eval Process decision deferred and therefore maintain their current membership status until the conditional is resolved. | ||
| When the deadline expires, the conditional will be brought before E-Board, who will assess its completeness. | ||
| A conditional member who does not meet these additional requirements will have failed the Eval. | ||
| A conditional member who does not meet these additional requirements will have failed the Eval Process. | ||
|
|
||
| \asubsection{Active Membership Leave of Absence} | ||
| \renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}} % For this section, we want items to use letters | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be a semantic change. I don't think it's what you mean. Did you mean to change it to Standard Operating Session?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or "annually" perhaps. The way it is now could be interpretted is that you must participate in at least one major project throughout your active membership
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Either way it'd be a semantic change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a difference between academic year and standard operating session?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But also section 3.A states "Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the requirements and expectations defined in the Constitution are for the Standard Operating Session"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To my other question, I might need a grammar freak like @Qelxiros to help me understand why "Evals process" is strictly referring to Spring Evals instead of either Intro or Spring Evals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The above comment from him:
And then I had a response right below it:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wasn't yet resolved so I'm not sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw that message, but I don't understand the thought process. Sometimes when we say Eval when referring to Intro Evals as well. I was wondering if that thought came from the constitution somehow.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All of these should probably be changed to Membership Eval, if we want to abbreviate Evaluation. I don't think we should cut "Membership" off. It is "implied" that "Eval" in a definition of a specific [name] Evaluation refers back to it, but we should probably keep it explicit.