Add a risk section - #208
Conversation
Co-authored-by: axel-loewe <52000348+axel-loewe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: axel-loewe <52000348+axel-loewe@users.noreply.github.com>
| that while the unit is a central infrastructure, it needs to be able within | ||
| the agile structures of academic research, therefore a certain lack of structures is expected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this part of the sentence is not clear
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tried my hand at clarifying it... Not sure I succeeded.
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
|
Meeting: General concept of risk section is good, we should review for language. Also do not write "subsubsection", but just "subsection" to the reviewers. |
use utf8 quotes
mhagdorn
left a comment
mhagdorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apart from the minor suggestions I think we need to sharpen the sentence about governance.
The other issue is on measuring success. I presume that an RSE unit will need to attract external funding, through work on projects (we do have an entire section on that). The risk is then, failure to attract enough funding. At this stage the institution would need to decide whether they want to keep the RSE unit.
| This comes partially from the aforementioned stakeholders, but also from the necessity, that while the unit is a central infrastructure, | ||
| it needs to be able to provide the services of their employees within the agile structures of academic research -- close to the scientists. | ||
| Therefore a certain lack of formalised, organisational structures can be expected. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is This - the governance? Agile structures at a university? What are you trying to say here? I think this sounds a little bit vague and that RSEs would like to do stuff.
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
Co-authored-by: Magnus Hagdorn <magnus.hagdorn@charite.de>
5 participants
Not sure about the position in the text.
Still the question is, if we want to dedicate a risk section.