Skip to content

[autoscaling] Re-sync local-owner DPAs on annotation changes#51173

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection
May 22, 2026
Merged

[autoscaling] Re-sync local-owner DPAs on annotation changes#51173
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection

Conversation

@clamoriniere
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Fixes a bug in the workload autoscaling controller where annotation-only edits on a
locally-owned DatadogPodAutoscaler were silently ignored until the next .spec
change or cluster-agent restart.

The Local-owner branch in syncPodAutoscaler previously gated UpdateFromPodAutoscaler
on .metadata.generation changes. Annotation edits don't bump .metadata.generation,
so adding/changing autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview (or any other annotation the
controller reads) did nothing — IsBurstable() and the parsed previewOptions stayed
stale, and the burstable CPU-limit removal never took effect.

The gate is replaced by NeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler, which compares:

  • .metadata.generation
  • the profile label (autoscaling.datadoghq.com/profile)
  • every annotation consumed by UpdateFromPodAutoscaler (preview, profile-template-hash, custom-recommender)

The list of relevant annotation keys (resyncMetadataKeysFromPodAutoscaler) lives next
to UpdateFromPodAutoscaler with an explicit comment to keep the two in sync.

Motivation

Customer report: a DatadogPodAutoscaler with owner: Local had the burstable preview
annotation added post-creation, but the workload's CPU limits were never stripped. Root
cause traced to the generation-only gate at controller.go Local-owner branch — the
parsing in UpdateFromPodAutoscaler was never re-invoked after the annotation appeared.

Describe how you validated your changes

Unit tests (pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/):

  • New TestNeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler with 10 sub-tests covering: no cached upstream, identical object (no resync), generation bump, preview annotation added/changed/removed, profile label change, profile-template-hash change, custom-recommender change, and an irrelevant annotation that must NOT trigger a resync.

Full suite (./pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/...): all 14 packages green.

End-to-end on a kind cluster with a cluster-agent built from this branch:

  • Created a Local DPA with no preview annotation, observed initial state.
  • Ran kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview='{\"burstable\":true}' — the controller logged a re-sync at generation 1, no spec change.
  • Ran kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview- to remove it — the controller logged a re-sync again at generation 1.
  • Confirmed previewOptions.Burstable flipped on both transitions.

Before this change, the same scenario produced no re-sync log and IsBurstable() stayed false.

Additional Notes

  • Workaround for customers on an affected agent: kubectl -n datadog rollout restart deploy/datadog-cluster-agent, or any .spec edit to force a generation bump.
  • The agent autoscaler-list CLI prints Burstable: false for all DPAs regardless of state because previewOptions is unexported and stripped during IPC serialization; that is a separate issue tracked outside this PR.

🤖 Assisted by Claude:claude-opus-4-7

@clamoriniere clamoriniere requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2026 15:47
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label May 21, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the medium review PR review might take time label May 21, 2026
@datadog-prod-us1-3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented May 21, 2026

Pipelines

Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 1 Pipeline job failed

DataDog/datadog-agent | oracle: [21.3.0-xe]   View in Datadog   GitLab

🛟 This job is unlikely to succeed on retry. Please review your pipeline configuration. Failed to ping oracle instance: ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor

ℹ️ Info

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 88.24%
Overall Coverage: 50.36% (+0.02%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: a9300a7 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@clamoriniere clamoriniere added qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/container-autoscaling labels May 21, 2026
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
@clamoriniere clamoriniere force-pushed the clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection branch from ee50d0e to 3a35e1d Compare May 21, 2026 17:16
The Local-owner sync gate in syncPodAutoscaler only invoked
UpdateFromPodAutoscaler when .metadata.generation changed. Annotation
edits do not bump generation, so adding or changing
autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview on an existing DPA was silently
ignored until the next .spec edit or cluster-agent restart — leaving
IsBurstable() and the parsed previewOptions stale and preventing the
burstable CPU-limit removal from taking effect.

Cache a murmur3 fingerprint of the labels/annotations consumed by
UpdateFromPodAutoscaler on PodAutoscalerInternal (metadataHash, exposed
via MetadataHash()). Expose ComputePodAutoscalerMetadataHash for the
controller to compute the same fingerprint on the incoming K8s object.
The Local-owner branch now triggers a re-sync when either the generation
or the metadata hash differs, so the gate no longer depends on holding a
reference to the cached K8s object.

The watched label/annotation key lists (preview, profile-template-hash,
custom-recommender) live next to UpdateFromPodAutoscaler so future
additions stay in sync with the hash.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7
@clamoriniere clamoriniere force-pushed the clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection branch from 3a35e1d to a59562b Compare May 21, 2026 17:23
@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 21, 2026

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor b7c4f46b:

Results for datadog-agent_7.81.0~devel.git.149.a9300a7.pipeline.114774855-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 21, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor b7c4f46
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +4.16 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.57% of buffer) 206.995 → 206.999 → 207.710
31 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 745.248 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 703.018 MiB
agent_heroku_amd64 310.138 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 745.232 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 703.002 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 722.791 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips 683.727 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 745.232 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 703.002 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 722.791 MiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips 683.727 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 805.389 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 807.769 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 996.309 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 987.467 MiB
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 220.952 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.154 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.487 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.690 MiB
docker_host_profiler_amd64 302.188 MiB
docker_host_profiler_arm64 313.676 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.143 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.272 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.143 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.143 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 44.582 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 41.539 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 42.247 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 44.582 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 44.582 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da Bot commented May 21, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: a6dea2e1-61b5-4d09-91f9-8c62dba13141

Baseline: 8e51ad9
Comparison: 8dde25f
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -0.98 [-3.93, +1.97] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.90 [+1.72, +2.09] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization +0.78 [+0.71, +0.85] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.09 [-0.11, +0.29] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.07 [-0.16, +0.31] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.17, +0.22] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.37, +0.42] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.02 [-0.07, +0.11] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.18, +0.22] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization +0.01 [-0.09, +0.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.45, +0.45] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.12, +0.12] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.09, +0.08] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.48, +0.47] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization -0.01 [-0.18, +0.15] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.04 [-0.22, +0.14] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.06 [-0.11, -0.02] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization -0.13 [-0.18, -0.08] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.16 [-0.20, -0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.24 [-0.29, -0.18] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization -0.47 [-0.63, -0.31] 1 Logs
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -0.98 [-3.93, +1.97] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -1.62 [-1.86, -1.38] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.00 [-3.01, -1.00] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 715 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 245.93MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 741 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.16GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.17GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 142.33MiB ≤ 147MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 740.44KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 2 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 423.57MiB ≤ 495MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.11MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 175.87MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.35MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 346.64 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 383.05MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@clamoriniere clamoriniere requested a review from vboulineau May 22, 2026 14:22
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler_test.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@HemeryJu HemeryJu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, approving now to unblock but I agree with Vincent comment!

@github-actions github-actions Bot added long review PR is complex, plan time to review it and removed medium review PR review might take time labels May 22, 2026
@clamoriniere clamoriniere added backport/7.79.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.79.x branch once the PR is merged backport/7.80.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.80.x branch once the PR is merged labels May 22, 2026
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/pod_autoscaler.go Outdated
@clamoriniere clamoriniere force-pushed the clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection branch from c037467 to a9300a7 Compare May 22, 2026 15:31
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 8dde25f into main May 22, 2026
238 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the clamoriniere/fix-burstable-annotation-detection branch May 22, 2026 17:35
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.81.0 milestone May 22, 2026
@clamoriniere clamoriniere added backport/7.79.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.79.x branch once the PR is merged and removed backport/7.79.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.79.x branch once the PR is merged backport/7.80.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.80.x branch once the PR is merged labels May 22, 2026
@clamoriniere clamoriniere added the backport/7.80.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.80.x branch once the PR is merged label May 22, 2026
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
…n changes (#51244)

Backport 8dde25f from #51173.

 ___

### What does this PR do?

Fixes a bug in the workload autoscaling controller where annotation-only edits on a
locally-owned `DatadogPodAutoscaler` were silently ignored until the next `.spec`
change or cluster-agent restart.

The Local-owner branch in `syncPodAutoscaler` previously gated `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler`
on `.metadata.generation` changes. Annotation edits don't bump `.metadata.generation`,
so adding/changing `autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview` (or any other annotation the
controller reads) did nothing — `IsBurstable()` and the parsed `previewOptions` stayed
stale, and the burstable CPU-limit removal never took effect.

The gate is replaced by `NeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler`, which compares:
- `.metadata.generation`
- the profile label (`autoscaling.datadoghq.com/profile`)
- every annotation consumed by `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` (`preview`, `profile-template-hash`, `custom-recommender`)

The list of relevant annotation keys (`resyncMetadataKeysFromPodAutoscaler`) lives next
to `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` with an explicit comment to keep the two in sync.

### Motivation

Customer report: a `DatadogPodAutoscaler` with `owner: Local` had the burstable preview
annotation added post-creation, but the workload's CPU limits were never stripped. Root
cause traced to the generation-only gate at `controller.go` Local-owner branch — the
parsing in `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` was never re-invoked after the annotation appeared.

### Describe how you validated your changes

**Unit tests** (`pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/`):
- New `TestNeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler` with 10 sub-tests covering: no cached upstream, identical object (no resync), generation bump, preview annotation added/changed/removed, profile label change, profile-template-hash change, custom-recommender change, and an irrelevant annotation that must NOT trigger a resync.

**Full suite** (`./pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/...`): all 14 packages green.

**End-to-end on a kind cluster** with a cluster-agent built from this branch:
- Created a Local DPA with no preview annotation, observed initial state.
- Ran `kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview='{\"burstable\":true}'` — the controller logged a re-sync at generation 1, no spec change.
- Ran `kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview-` to remove it — the controller logged a re-sync again at generation 1.
- Confirmed `previewOptions.Burstable` flipped on both transitions.

Before this change, the same scenario produced no re-sync log and `IsBurstable()` stayed false.

### Additional Notes

- Workaround for customers on an affected agent: `kubectl -n datadog rollout restart deploy/datadog-cluster-agent`, or any `.spec` edit to force a generation bump.
- The `agent autoscaler-list` CLI prints `Burstable: false` for all DPAs regardless of state because `previewOptions` is unexported and stripped during IPC serialization; that is a separate issue tracked outside this PR.

🤖 Assisted by Claude:claude-opus-4-7

Co-authored-by: florent.clarret <florent.clarret@datadoghq.com>
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2026
…n changes (#51243)

Backport 8dde25f from #51173.

 ___

### What does this PR do?

Fixes a bug in the workload autoscaling controller where annotation-only edits on a
locally-owned `DatadogPodAutoscaler` were silently ignored until the next `.spec`
change or cluster-agent restart.

The Local-owner branch in `syncPodAutoscaler` previously gated `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler`
on `.metadata.generation` changes. Annotation edits don't bump `.metadata.generation`,
so adding/changing `autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview` (or any other annotation the
controller reads) did nothing — `IsBurstable()` and the parsed `previewOptions` stayed
stale, and the burstable CPU-limit removal never took effect.

The gate is replaced by `NeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler`, which compares:
- `.metadata.generation`
- the profile label (`autoscaling.datadoghq.com/profile`)
- every annotation consumed by `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` (`preview`, `profile-template-hash`, `custom-recommender`)

The list of relevant annotation keys (`resyncMetadataKeysFromPodAutoscaler`) lives next
to `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` with an explicit comment to keep the two in sync.

### Motivation

Customer report: a `DatadogPodAutoscaler` with `owner: Local` had the burstable preview
annotation added post-creation, but the workload's CPU limits were never stripped. Root
cause traced to the generation-only gate at `controller.go` Local-owner branch — the
parsing in `UpdateFromPodAutoscaler` was never re-invoked after the annotation appeared.

### Describe how you validated your changes

**Unit tests** (`pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/workload/model/`):
- New `TestNeedsResyncFromPodAutoscaler` with 10 sub-tests covering: no cached upstream, identical object (no resync), generation bump, preview annotation added/changed/removed, profile label change, profile-template-hash change, custom-recommender change, and an irrelevant annotation that must NOT trigger a resync.

**Full suite** (`./pkg/clusteragent/autoscaling/...`): all 14 packages green.

**End-to-end on a kind cluster** with a cluster-agent built from this branch:
- Created a Local DPA with no preview annotation, observed initial state.
- Ran `kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview='{\"burstable\":true}'` — the controller logged a re-sync at generation 1, no spec change.
- Ran `kubectl annotate dpa ... autoscaling.datadoghq.com/preview-` to remove it — the controller logged a re-sync again at generation 1.
- Confirmed `previewOptions.Burstable` flipped on both transitions.

Before this change, the same scenario produced no re-sync log and `IsBurstable()` stayed false.

### Additional Notes

- Workaround for customers on an affected agent: `kubectl -n datadog rollout restart deploy/datadog-cluster-agent`, or any `.spec` edit to force a generation bump.
- The `agent autoscaler-list` CLI prints `Burstable: false` for all DPAs regardless of state because `previewOptions` is unexported and stripped during IPC serialization; that is a separate issue tracked outside this PR.

🤖 Assisted by Claude:claude-opus-4-7

Co-authored-by: florent.clarret <florent.clarret@datadoghq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport/7.79.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.79.x branch once the PR is merged backport/7.80.x Automatically create a backport PR to the 7.80.x branch once the PR is merged internal Identify a non-fork PR long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/container-autoscaling

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants