Skip to content

1850 aero ndep ozone#403

Draft
ekluzek wants to merge 8 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
ekluzek:1850_aero_ndep_ozone
Draft

1850 aero ndep ozone#403
ekluzek wants to merge 8 commits into
ESCOMP:mainfrom
ekluzek:1850_aero_ndep_ozone

Conversation

@ekluzek
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek commented Apr 15, 2026

Description of changes

Work with 1850_clim settings for aerosols, ndep and ozone. As well as some work with CPLHIST options for those.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @billsacks

CDEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #399
Fixes #388
Fixes #389
Fixes #390
Fixes #392

Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list):

Are changes expected to change answers (bfb, different to roundoff, more substantial): No
This will add some new options, but won't change defaults (which primarily need to be changed in compsets anyway)

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): Yes

Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc): Have tested a few cases will test aux_cdeps against cesm3_0_beta08 tests

Hashes used for testing:

Definition of done:

  • Finish work on all of the modes
  • Add needed aux_cdeps tests
  • Test against the aux_cdeps cesm3_0_beta08 baseline and make sure identical
  • Test in the context of CTSM and make sure it does everything needed

@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement New feature or request CESM Only labels Apr 15, 2026
@ekluzek ekluzek added answers are bfb Responsibility: CTSM Responsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group labels Apr 15, 2026
@wwieder
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wwieder commented May 20, 2026

It's not clear to me if the intent of this PR + #405 are needed for:

  1. CLM to be able to use CPL_HIST output (and therefore lower priority for an alpha tag); or
  2. CESM to write out CPL_HIST files that we'll use for spinup (and therefore a higher priority)?

@billsacks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It's not clear to me if the intent of this PR + #405 are needed for:

  1. CLM to be able to use CPL_HIST output (and therefore lower priority for an alpha tag); or
  2. CESM to write out CPL_HIST files that we'll use for spinup (and therefore a higher priority)?

It's (1) - to be able to use CPLHIST output.

@wwieder
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wwieder commented May 21, 2026

OK, if this is only needed for CTSM to read CPL_HIST data my read is that this PR isn't critical for the next alpha09 tag. What do others think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

answers are bfb CESM Only enhancement New feature or request Responsibility: CTSM Responsibility to manage and accomplish this issue is the CTSM Software group

Projects

Status: In Progress

3 participants