Skip to content

Apply review follow-ups to Cloud billing and quota docs - #7946

Open
dimitrieh wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
repackaging/docs-billing-and-quota-followup
Open

Apply review follow-ups to Cloud billing and quota docs#7946
dimitrieh wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
repackaging/docs-billing-and-quota-followup

Conversation

@dimitrieh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Follow-up to #7930, which was merged without applying the review suggestions left on it.

  • docs/cloud/billing.md: applied the three review suggestions verbatim. The billing-cycle sentence now carves out teams on a yearly contract agreed with sales; the pro-rated charge sentence now names Hosted and Remote Instances and the included amount; the removal sentence now says "an instance" rather than "a Node-RED instance". Billing mechanics are unchanged.
  • docs/cloud/introduction.md: the File Storage and Context Store quota tables were left with a single row each after the deprecated tiers were removed, which reads oddly. Both are now prose stating the Enterprise figure (100GB and 1GB per instance). No figures changed.

Out of scope: the open question on whether the Small/Medium/Large instance size choice should be deprecated for users is unanswered, so introduction.md line 112 is left as is.

@dimitrieh dimitrieh left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Annotating each change against the review note it comes from, so the origin is traceable now that the source PR is closed. All four notes were left as review comments on #7930 and were never applied before that PR merged.

Still open and deliberately not touched here: the question of whether the Small/Medium/Large instance size choice should be deprecated for users entirely (#7930 (comment)). That has had no reply, so the gating sentence at docs/cloud/introduction.md line 112 is left as it is.

Comment thread docs/cloud/billing.md
## Billing Cycle

Teams are billed monthly on the anniversary of the team creation. You will receive one bill for each team.
If you've signed up to FlowFuse Cloud without a yearly contract agreed upon with our sales team, your FlowFuse teams are billed monthly on the anniversary of the team creation. You will receive one bill for each team.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applies the suggestion at #7930 (comment) verbatim. Adds the carve-out for customers on a yearly contract agreed with sales, who are not billed monthly on the team anniversary.

Comment thread docs/cloud/billing.md
If you've signed up to FlowFuse Cloud without a yearly contract agreed upon with our sales team, your FlowFuse teams are billed monthly on the anniversary of the team creation. You will receive one bill for each team.

Node-RED Instances and Devices are added as pro-rated charges on the current billing cycle and invoiced
Hosted and Remote Instances which are added beyond the included amount are pro-rated charges on the current billing cycle and invoiced

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applies the suggestion at #7930 (comment) verbatim. Moves to current product vocabulary (Hosted and Remote Instances rather than Node-RED Instances and Devices) and adds the qualifier that only instances beyond the included amount are pro-rated. The "at the end of the cycle." continuation on the next line is unchanged.

Comment thread docs/cloud/billing.md
## Removing Instances

When a Node-RED instance is deleted your account will receive pro-rated credit for the time remaining in the billing cycle.
When an instance is deleted your account will receive pro-rated credit for the time remaining in the billing cycle.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applies the suggestion at #7930 (comment) verbatim. Terminology only, "a Node-RED instance" to "an instance".

|--------|--------|
| Enterprise | 100GB |
A quota limit is applied to how much data can be stored, based on the Team type.
Enterprise teams have a file storage quota of 100GB per instance.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addresses #7930 (comment) ("now it's a table with 1 line. Seems odd?"). That note was left on the Context Store table, but removing the deprecated tiers left this File Storage table in the same single-row shape, so both are converted to prose. The 100GB figure is unchanged.

| Team Type | Context Store Quota (per instance) |
|--------|--------|
| Enterprise | 1GB |
Enterprise teams have a context store quota of 1GB per instance.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The table this replaces is the one the note at #7930 (comment) was left on. The 1GB figure is unchanged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants