Skip to content

chore(main): release engine-and-dependents libraries#8595

Merged
JSONbored merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--groups--engine-and-dependents
Jul 25, 2026
Merged

chore(main): release engine-and-dependents libraries#8595
JSONbored merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
release-please--branches--main--groups--engine-and-dependents

Conversation

@JSONbored

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

engine: 3.14.1

3.14.1 (2026-07-25)

Chores

  • engine: Synchronize engine-and-dependents versions
mcp: 3.14.1

3.14.1 (2026-07-25)

Fixes

  • build: migrate loopover-miner/loopover-mcp to out-of-place dist/ emit (#8590) (c896797)

Dependencies

  • The following workspace dependencies were updated
    • dependencies
      • @loopover/engine bumped from ^3.14.0 to ^3.14.1
miner: 3.14.1

3.14.1 (2026-07-25)

Fixes

  • build: migrate loopover-miner/loopover-mcp to out-of-place dist/ emit (#8590) (c896797)

Dependencies

  • The following workspace dependencies were updated
    • dependencies
      • @loopover/engine bumped from ^3.14.0 to ^3.14.1

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying with  Cloudflare Workers  Cloudflare Workers

The latest updates on your project. Learn more about integrating Git with Workers.

Status Name Latest Commit Updated (UTC)
🔵 In progress
View logs
loopover-ui 996a8c9 Jul 25 2026, 01:28 AM

@superagent-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Superagent didn't find any vulnerabilities or security issues in this PR.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.54%. Comparing base (7b1f1cc) to head (8a5ff39).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8595   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.54%   92.54%           
=======================================
  Files         796      796           
  Lines       79855    79855           
  Branches    24136    24136           
=======================================
  Hits        73905    73905           
  Misses       4804     4804           
  Partials     1146     1146           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 93.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@loopover-orb loopover-orb Bot added the gittensor:bug Gittensor-scored bug fix — scores a 0.05x multiplier. label Jul 25, 2026
@loopover-orb

loopover-orb Bot commented Jul 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

⏸️ LoopOver review result - manual review recommended

Review updated: 2026-07-25 02:20:31 UTC

9 files · 1 AI reviewer · 1 blocker · CI green · clean

⏸️ Suggested Action - Manual Review

Review summary
This is an automated release-please version bump for the engine-and-dependents packages (engine, mcp, miner) from 3.14.0 to 3.14.1, synchronizing package.json versions, the manifest, expected-engine.version, changelogs, and package-lock.json. The version bumps are internally consistent — engine's own version, the mcp/miner dependency ranges on @​loopover/engine, and expected-engine.version are all updated in lockstep, and package-lock.json entries are updated to match. This is mechanical, generated release-automation content with no functional code changes.

Nits — 3 non-blocking
  • package-lock.json is a large generated diff, but that's expected for a release-please version-sync PR and shouldn't be held to the same scrutiny as hand-written code.
  • Verify CI passes on this commit before merge, particularly db:migrations:check and manifest:drift-check, since those check version/manifest consistency across the repo.
  • Diff looks like trivial or whitespace-only churn — Reduce whitespace-only or formatting-only churn and keep the diff focused on substantive changes.

Concerns raised — review before merging

  • No linked issue detected: No closing reference or linked issue number was found in the PR metadata/body. — If this PR is intended to solve an issue, link it explicitly in the PR body.
📋 Copy for AI agents — paste into your coding agent
Fix the following blocker(s) from this PR review:

1. No linked issue detected: No closing reference or linked issue number was found in the PR metadata/body. — If this PR is intended to solve an issue, link it explicitly in the PR body.

Decision drivers

  • ❌ Code review — 1 blocker (1 reviewer)
  • ❌ Gate result — Blocking (Repo-configured hard blocker found.)
Context & advisory signals — never blocks the verdict
Signal Result Evidence
Linked issue ✅ No-issue rationale PR body explains why no issue is linked.
Related work ✅ No active overlap found No same-issue or scoped active PR overlap found.
Change scope ✅ 20/20 Low review scope from cached public metadata (no linked issue context).
Validation posture ⚠️ 20/25 Preflight is ready, but the PR body does not name the validation run.
Contributor workload ✅ 10/10 Author activity: 13 registered-repo PR(s), 13 merged, 277 issue(s).
Contributor context ✅ Confirmed Gittensor contributor JSONbored; Gittensor profile; 13 PR(s), 277 issue(s).
Improvement ℹ️ Insufficient signal risk: low · value: insufficient-signal
Review context
  • Author: JSONbored
  • Role context: owner (maintainer lane)
  • Public audience mode: oss maintainer
  • Lane context: Repository is configured for direct PR review.
  • Public profile languages: not available
  • Official Gittensor activity: 13 PR(s), 277 issue(s).
  • PR-specific overlap: none found.
Contributor next steps
  • Start here: Treat this as maintainer-lane context rather than normal contributor-lane activity.
  • Then work through the remaining 1 step in the Signals table above.
Signal definitions
  • Related work = same linked issue, overlapping active PRs, or title/path similarity.
  • Change scope = cached public metadata such as size labels, draft state, and review-burden hints.
  • Validation posture = whether the PR provides enough public validation/test evidence for maintainer review.
  • Contributor workload = public contributor activity and cleanup pressure, not a repo-wide quality failure.
  • Contributor context = public GitHub/Gittensor identity context; non-Gittensor status is not a blocker.
🧪 Chat with LoopOver

Ask LoopOver a question about this PR directly in a comment — grounded only in the same cached, public-safe facts shown above, never a new claim.

  • @loopover ask &lt;question&gt; answers contribution-quality Q&A with source citations and freshness.
  • @loopover chat &lt;question&gt; answers in natural prose from cached decision-pack facts via local inference (maintainer/collaborator; read-only).
  • A plain-language @loopover mention with a real question is routed to the closest matching read-only command automatically — no exact syntax required.

Full command reference: https://loopover.ai/docs/loopover-commands

🧪 Experimental — new and may change.

🟩 Safe / merged · 🟦 Advisory · 🟨 Held for review · 🟥 Blocked / closed


💰 Earn for open-source contributions like this. Gittensor lets GitHub contributors earn for the work they already do — register to start earning →.

Checked by LoopOver, a quiet PR intelligence layer for OSS maintainers.

  • Re-run LoopOver review

@loopover-orb loopover-orb Bot added the manual-review Gittensor contributor context label Jul 25, 2026
@JSONbored
JSONbored merged commit 0e72d94 into main Jul 25, 2026
8 checks passed
@JSONbored
JSONbored deleted the release-please--branches--main--groups--engine-and-dependents branch July 25, 2026 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

autorelease: pending gittensor:bug Gittensor-scored bug fix — scores a 0.05x multiplier. manual-review Gittensor contributor context

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant