Skip to content

Fix formatting of nout parameter in CombiTable1Ds#4

Open
MatthiasBSchaefer wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
MatthiasBSchaefer-patch-1
Open

Fix formatting of nout parameter in CombiTable1Ds#4
MatthiasBSchaefer wants to merge 7 commits into
masterfrom
MatthiasBSchaefer-patch-1

Conversation

@MatthiasBSchaefer

@MatthiasBSchaefer MatthiasBSchaefer commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Improved spacing/formatting in the 1D combinational table block declaration for better readability.
    • Adjusted minor banner/header comment formatting in the Modelica I/O C source.
  • Documentation
    • Added an extra note in the source header area and updated the header changelog entry to reflect a new documentation update date.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@MatthiasBSchaefer, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e6ba9a0a-46c7-407a-ae4b-bb998b9acd56

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58d4ea0 and eea5f01.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Modelica/Electrical/Analog/Basic/Resistor.mo
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Formatting-only changes update the CombiTable1Ds declaration and ModelicaIO.c header comments. No executable behavior, connector sizing, or exported entity declarations changed.

Changes

Formatting updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Source formatting updates
Modelica/Blocks/Tables.mo, Modelica/Resources/C-Sources/ModelicaIO.c
Spacing was adjusted in the nout assignment and delimiter parameter; C source banner, standalone comment, and changelog text were updated without implementation changes.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title is concise and accurately describes the main visible change in CombiTable1Ds formatting.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch MatthiasBSchaefer-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@MSL-RegressionTesting-CI MSL-RegressionTesting-CI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MSL-RegressionTesting-CI MSL-RegressionTesting-CI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MSL-RegressionTesting-CI MSL-RegressionTesting-CI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MSL-RegressionTesting-CI MSL-RegressionTesting-CI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MatthiasBSchaefer MatthiasBSchaefer added the secure-c-code mark, that the changes in the c code are not malicious label Jul 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

secure-c-code mark, that the changes in the c code are not malicious

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants