feat(matplotlib): implement polar-basic#9776
Conversation
Regen from quality 88. Addressed: - canvas drift: previous 12x12in@300dpi (3600x3600, non-canonical) replaced with the canonical square 6x6in@400dpi (2400x2400); dropped bbox_inches="tight" - font sizes rescaled to match the 2400x2400 canonical convention (title 24->12, angular ticks 18->9, radial ticks 16->8) since the previous values were calibrated for the old non-canonical dpi/figsize combo - restored the "Peak 23.4°C" annotation callout that the previous review's image showed but the merged base code was missing - added a dashed daily-average reference ring (second radial layer) and a FuncFormatter for radial tick labels in place of a static label list, per the review's library-mastery note about advanced polar techniques - fixed a real overlap bug found during self-check: the polar y-Axis container's own zorder (2.5 default) governs the whole radial tick-label group's draw order, not each Text's zorder, so the scatter markers (zorder=3) rendered on top of the "10°C" tick label; raised ax.yaxis zorder and gave labels a background halo so they stay legible over the filled data area - kept the multi-layer fill+line+scatter design, data scenario, and theme handling unchanged (review's strengths)
AI Review - Attempt 1/3Image Description
Score: 88/100
Visual Quality (26/30)
Design Excellence (15/20)
Spec Compliance (13/15)
Data Quality (15/15)
Code Quality (10/10)
Library Mastery (9/10)
Score Caps Applied
Strengths
Weaknesses
Issues Found
AI Feedback for Next Attempt
Verdict: REJECTED |
Attempt 1/4 - fixes based on AI review
🔧 Repair Attempt 1/4Applied fixes based on AI review feedback. Status: Repair completed, re-triggering review... |
AI Review - Attempt 2/3Image Description
Score: 77/100
Visual Quality (20/30)
Design Excellence (14/20)
Spec Compliance (13/15)
Data Quality (13/15)
Code Quality (10/10)
Library Mastery (7/10)
Score Caps Applied
Strengths
Weaknesses
Issues Found
AI Feedback for Next Attempt
Verdict: REJECTED |
Attempt 2/4 - fixes based on AI review
🔧 Repair Attempt 2/4Applied fixes based on AI review feedback. Status: Repair completed, re-triggering review... |
AI Review - Attempt 3/3Image Description
Score: 0/100
AR-09 Auto-Reject: Title Clipped at Right Canvas EdgeThe mandated title Root cause: Suggested fix direction for repair: lower the effective floor (or use a canvas-width-aware floor) for square-canvas titles, wrap the title onto two lines, or otherwise guarantee the full mandated Visual Quality (0/30)
Design Excellence (0/20)
Spec Compliance (0/15)
Data Quality (0/15)
Code Quality (0/10)
Library Mastery (0/10)
Score Caps Applied
Strengths
Weaknesses
Issues Found
AI Feedback for Next Attempt
Verdict: REJECTED |
🔧 AI Review Produced No Score — Auto-RetryingThe Claude Code Action ran but didn't write |
AI Review - Attempt 3/3Image Description
Score: 0/100
AR-09 (Edge Clipping) auto-reject fires — per Visual Quality (0/30)
Design Excellence (0/20)
Spec Compliance (0/15)
Data Quality (0/15)
Code Quality (0/10)
Library Mastery (0/10)
Score Caps Applied
Strengths(Noted for the repair loop's benefit even though the auto-reject zeroes the score — everything below should be preserved while fixing the title.)
Weaknesses
Issues Found
AI Feedback for Next Attempt
Verdict: REJECTED |
❌ AI Review Failed (auto-retry exhausted)The AI review action completed but did not produce valid output files. Auto-retry already tried once. What happened:
Manual rerun: |
AI Review - Attempt 3/3Image Description
Score: 0/100
AR-09 override: an auto-reject condition (edge clipping) was triggered, which per the review rules force-sets the total score to 0/100 and the verdict to REJECTED, regardless of the category subtotals. The category breakdown below (which would sum to 77/100 excluding the clipping penalty already applied to VQ-01/VQ-05/VQ-06/SC-04) is kept intact purely as repair signal — the rest of the implementation is genuinely solid. Visual Quality (17/30, hard-zeroed to 0 by AR-09)
Design Excellence (15/20)
Spec Compliance (13/15)
Data Quality (15/15)
Code Quality (10/10)
Library Mastery (7/10)
Score Caps Applied
Strengths
Weaknesses
Issues Found
AI Feedback for Next Attempt
Verdict: REJECTED |
❌ AI Review Failed (auto-retry exhausted)The AI review action completed but did not produce valid output files. Auto-retry already tried once. What happened:
Manual rerun: |
Implementation:
polar-basic- python/matplotlibImplements the python/matplotlib version of
polar-basic.File:
plots/polar-basic/implementations/python/matplotlib.pyParent Issue: #800
🤖 impl-generate workflow