feat: added settiings button in the mobile view.#1053
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 45 minutes and 9 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe ChangesMobile Settings Access & Navigation Fix
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@platforms/pictique/client/src/lib/fragments/Header/Header.svelte`:
- Around line 115-123: The onclick handler in the button element is using
goto('/settings') directly, which violates the
svelte/no-navigation-without-resolve rule and is not base-path-safe. Replace the
goto('/settings') call with goto(resolve('/settings')) to properly resolve the
internal navigation path using the resolve function, ensuring the navigation
respects the configured base path and follows the Svelte linting rules.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d05e07b3-7efb-4a9e-a62e-7affe5e4c107
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
platforms/pictique/client/src/lib/fragments/BottomNav/BottomNav.svelteplatforms/pictique/client/src/lib/fragments/Header/Header.svelte
Description of change
Added settings button at the top in the mobile view only in the profile page because that makes the most sense instead of doing it on every page.
Issue Number
Closes #1040
Type of change
How the change has been tested
Manually
Change checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style