Skip to content

chore(release): prepare 0.53.0 - #182

Merged
elkaix merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.53.0
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

chore(release): prepare 0.53.0#182
elkaix merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/0.53.0

Conversation

@elkaix

@elkaix elkaix commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Release 0.53.0

Changes in this release

  • GPT/ChatGPT session re-authentication crash fixed. A fatal "Could not resolve authentication method" error when a session token is invalidated mid-session (e.g. the OAuth refresh token was rotated by signing in on another machine) now surfaces as a typed 401 that routes into the standard re-authentication path — prompting /login rather than dumping a traceback.
  • ImplementAndJudge renders as Implement & Judge — <brief> in the TUI. The chain no longer shows the raw ImplementAndJudge(4 args: …) argument dump; it displays a clean Implement & Judge — <brief> label matching the style of other named subagent invocations.

Files changed

  • pyproject.toml + uv.lock — version bump 0.52.00.53.0
  • CHANGELOG.md — promote Unreleased → ## 0.53.0 (2026-06-23)
  • docs/en/release-notes/changelog.md — mirror
  • docs/en/release-notes/breaking-changes.md — add ## 0.53.0 (no breaking changes)
  • README.md — update What's New section + all asset version refs
  • docs/en/guides/getting-started.md + packages/linux-installer/README.md — version refs

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@elkaix, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 3 hours, 23 minutes, and 2 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

To continue reviewing without waiting, enable usage-based billing in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 38bc1960-0ebd-4890-bd45-6e6970da7894

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b092fef and 7dc9e7b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • docs/en/guides/getting-started.md is excluded by !docs/**
  • docs/en/release-notes/breaking-changes.md is excluded by !docs/**
  • docs/en/release-notes/changelog.md is excluded by !docs/**
  • uv.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md
  • packages/linux-installer/README.md
  • pyproject.toml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/0.53.0

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@elkaix
elkaix merged commit a12d6f7 into main Jun 24, 2026
52 checks passed
@elkaix
elkaix deleted the release/0.53.0 branch June 24, 2026 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant