release: 0.29.2

[davidhewitt]

I clearly let 0.29.1 get too big, missed some of the fix cherry-picks off 🤦‍♂️

It looks like we have some other fixes in the pipeline anyway, so let's get those merged and then push 0.29.2:

• fix: skip libpython rpath args on Windows and Cygwin #6284
• fix: pass class to classmethod magic methods #6283
• experimental-inspect: Iterator __next__ not optional #6274
• experimental-inspect: dedup union members #6273
• experimental-inspect: no-parameter pymodule_init keeps module complete #6271

[davidhewitt]

Also it looks like pydantic/pydantic#13572 (updating pydantic-core to 0.29.1) has hit a PyPy 3.11 issue, I will try to debug that in case there's something broken about PyPy support on 0.29.1 (I wouldn't be surprised if the GC fixes have broken PyPy, which doesn't have a fully working cycle GC mechanism).

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 18.63%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

#### 🎉 Hooray! `codspeed-rust` just leveled up to 5.0.1!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

⚡ 10 improved benchmarks
✅ 116 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	extract_u128_small	1,171.7 ns	956.9 ns	+22.44%
⚡	Simulation	extract_u128_zero	1,200.8 ns	986.1 ns	+21.77%
⚡	Simulation	extract_u128_u32_max	1.3 µs	1.1 µs	+20.28%
⚡	Simulation	extract_u128_u64_max	1.4 µs	1.2 µs	+18.34%
⚡	Simulation	extract_u128_max	1.4 µs	1.2 µs	+17.86%
⚡	Simulation	extract_i128_small_pos	1.2 µs	1 µs	+17.77%
⚡	Simulation	extract_i128_zero	1.3 µs	1.1 µs	+17.28%
⚡	Simulation	extract_i128_pos_max	1.5 µs	1.3 µs	+17.02%
⚡	Simulation	extract_i128_neg_min	1.5 µs	1.3 µs	+16.99%
⚡	Simulation	extract_i128_small_neg	1.3 µs	1.1 µs	+16.75%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing release-0.29.2 (a093054) with release-0.29 (646a38d)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on release-0.29 (d7ad41f) during the generation of this report, so e69ae19 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩