Small LaTeX adjustments#187
Merged
Merged
Conversation
this has better spacing
this is not recommended by others for semantic reasons, but I find the spacing much better
this can be checked in code reviews
311d743 to
0c17d31
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
:=have been replaced with\coloneqq. The vertical spacing is better. Same with the mirrored\eqqcolon.f \colon X \to Y(written by one contributor) andf : X \to Y(written in all other cases so far) have been unified: we only usef : X \to Y. Even though this is considered wrong, I must say that I never found any of these arguments compelling and also I like the spacing of the:much more.\simeq(\cong. The symbol\mathfrak{p}and\mathfrak{m}.