[build] document Bazel worktree output-base cleanup

[titusfortner]

🔗 Related Issues

💥 What does this PR do?

Documents that Bazel creates a per-checkout output base that, unlike the shared
--disk_cache/--repository_cache, is never garbage-collected when a worktree is deleted. In
worktree-heavy workflows these orphaned output bases accumulate and leak gigabytes. The README
"Using Worktrees" section and AGENTS.md "Agent workspace" now explain how to make a worktree
self-cleaning by pointing its output base inside the worktree (startup --output_base=.local/bazel-out),
with a Windows caveat preserving the existing --output_user_root guidance.

🔧 Implementation Notes

🤖 AI assistance

• No substantial AI assistance used
• AI assisted (complete below)
  • Tool(s): Claude Code
  • What was generated: Documentation wording in README.md and AGENTS.md
  • I reviewed all AI output and can explain the change

💡 Additional Considerations

🔄 Types of changes

• Cleanup (formatting, renaming)

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Document Bazel output-base cleanup for git worktrees
📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 10 minutes

Description

• Explain that Bazel output bases are per-checkout and persist after worktree deletion.
• Document a self-cleaning worktree setup via startup --output_base=.local/bazel-out.
• Add Windows guidance to keep using --output_user_root to avoid path-length issues.

Diagram

graph TD
  A["Git worktree"] --> B["Bazel build"] --> C["Set output_base in worktree?"]
  C -->|"Yes (macOS/Linux)"| D[".bazelrc.local: output_base=.local/bazel-out"] --> E["Worktree removal reclaims output"]
  C -->|"No (default)"| F["Output base keyed by path"] --> G["Orphaned output base (GB leak)"]
  H["Windows note: use output_user_root"] -.-> C

Loading

High-Level Assessment

The following are alternative approaches to this PR:

1. Add a cleanup helper script / git alias

• ➕ Automates cleanup; less reliance on developers reading/remembering docs
• ➕ Can detect and remove orphaned output bases safely with confirmation prompts
• ➖ More maintenance and platform-specific edge cases (Windows paths, permissions)
• ➖ Risk of deleting active output bases if detection is wrong

2. Standardize repo-provided per-worktree Bazel rc include

• ➕ Makes the safer default easy to adopt (drop-in config)
• ➕ Reduces per-developer configuration drift
• ➖ Harder to keep cross-platform behavior correct (Windows path-length constraints)
• ➖ May be viewed as too opinionated for diverse contributor environments

Recommendation: The documentation-first approach in this PR is the right immediate fix: it’s low-risk, explains the root cause (output bases persist per checkout path), and provides an actionable, per-worktree configuration that prevents disk leaks. Consider a follow-up enhancement only if orphaned output bases remain a common pain point: a small cleanup helper (opt-in) could further reduce operational burden, but it adds ongoing maintenance and safety concerns.

Files changed (2) +25 / -2

Documentation (2) +25 / -2

AGENTS.mdDocument self-cleaning Bazel output bases for worktree-based agent workflows +6/-2

Document self-cleaning Bazel output bases for worktree-based agent workflows

• Expands the Agent workspace guidance to explain Bazel’s per-checkout output base behavior in worktrees. Adds recommended configuration to place '--output_base' under '.local/' so output is reclaimed when a worktree is removed, and references README for shared cache setup.

AGENTS.md

README.mdExplain Bazel output-base leakage with worktrees and how to avoid it +19/-0

Explain Bazel output-base leakage with worktrees and how to avoid it

• Adds an explanation that Bazel output bases are not garbage-collected when a worktree is deleted, causing disk leaks in worktree-heavy workflows. Documents configuring 'startup --output_base=.local/bazel-out' for macOS/Linux and includes a Windows caveat to keep using '--output_user_root' for path-length limits.

README.md

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

Context used

✅ Compliance rules (platform): 11 rules

1. Wrong output_base invocation ✓ Resolved 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness

Description

AGENTS.md says users can “pass --output_base=.local/bazel-out”, but in this repo output_base is
handled as a Bazel startup option (via startup --...). Users following the docs may pass it as a
normal build/test flag and Bazel will reject it, breaking the worktree setup guidance.

Code

AGENTS.md[R43-44]

+  the worktree is removed: add `startup --output_base=.local/bazel-out` to the worktree's
+  `.bazelrc.local`, or pass `--output_base=.local/bazel-out`. By default Bazel keys the output base on

Evidence

The new AGENTS.md text explicitly offers passing --output_base directly, while the repo’s Bazel
configuration and README consistently treat these as startup options (indicating they are not
meant to be regular command flags). This inconsistency makes the AGENTS.md alternative instruction
unreliable.

AGENTS.md[41-46]
README.md[161-166]
.bazelrc[1-2]
.bazelrc[16-18]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`AGENTS.md` suggests users can alternatively “pass `--output_base=.local/bazel-out`”, but `--output_base` is a Bazel *startup* option (as shown elsewhere in the repo). This phrasing can lead users to pass it in the wrong position (as a command option), which Bazel will reject.

### Issue Context
The repo already documents `output_base` correctly as a `startup` option in `README.md`, and `.bazelrc` uses `startup` stanzas for startup-only flags.

### Fix Focus Areas
- AGENTS.md[42-46]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

Previous review results

Review updated until commit 95c82b3

Results up to commit cb95346

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0) 🎨 UX issues (0) 🔗 Cross-repo conflicts (0) 📜 Skill insights (0)

1. Wrong output_base invocation ✓ Resolved 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness

Description

AGENTS.md says users can “pass --output_base=.local/bazel-out”, but in this repo output_base is
handled as a Bazel startup option (via startup --...). Users following the docs may pass it as a
normal build/test flag and Bazel will reject it, breaking the worktree setup guidance.

Code

AGENTS.md[R43-44]

+  the worktree is removed: add `startup --output_base=.local/bazel-out` to the worktree's
+  `.bazelrc.local`, or pass `--output_base=.local/bazel-out`. By default Bazel keys the output base on

Evidence

The new AGENTS.md text explicitly offers passing --output_base directly, while the repo’s Bazel
configuration and README consistently treat these as startup options (indicating they are not
meant to be regular command flags). This inconsistency makes the AGENTS.md alternative instruction
unreliable.

AGENTS.md[41-46]
README.md[161-166]
.bazelrc[1-2]
.bazelrc[16-18]

Agent prompt

The issue below was found during a code review. Follow the provided context and guidance below and implement a solution

### Issue description
`AGENTS.md` suggests users can alternatively “pass `--output_base=.local/bazel-out`”, but `--output_base` is a Bazel *startup* option (as shown elsewhere in the repo). This phrasing can lead users to pass it in the wrong position (as a command option), which Bazel will reject.

### Issue Context
The repo already documents `output_base` correctly as a `startup` option in `README.md`, and `.bazelrc` uses `startup` stanzas for startup-only flags.

### Fix Focus Areas
- AGENTS.md[42-46]

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

---

[qodo-code-review]

Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit a9b4d83

[AutomatedTester]

This would be better in the bazelrc file so that everyone benefits

[titusfortner]

I like the idea, but I don't think we want to force this on everyone all the time. The output-base leak is specific to temporary worktrees on Mac/Linux. It would break things for Windows, and using a relative path can cause weird behaviors unless you always run bazel from top level directory.

[qodo-code-review]

Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit 95c82b3