docs: record P2/P3 audit closure in MASTER.md - #1474
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 56 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated ChangesProgress tracker updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
b824b96 to
d5ba4f0
Compare
2864ce2 to
ec0f4ac
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/progress/MASTER.md`:
- Line 87: Update the validate hard-gate summary in MASTER.md to distinguish the
current 13-layer configuration from the post-PR `#1468` target of 14 layers, or
explicitly label the listed 14 layers as the target configuration.
- Around line 100-102: Update the document’s master/live-tip reference near the
header, including the `8915c1c6` entry, to match the current `6d3875cb` commit
already recorded in the session entries. Ensure the document has a single
consistent source of truth for the current master commit.
- Around line 33-34: The progress section heading still reports seven gates
while the table now contains ten entries. Update the heading in
docs/progress/MASTER.md to reflect the table’s ten-entry count, or explicitly
define a grouping that makes the existing count accurate; keep all gate rows
unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: c5630c04-907f-4734-aca6-ef9cb1304c6e
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/progress/MASTER.md
| | shared-UI hubClient 门禁（A-V2 / A7#4 专属面） | #1468 | 共享 UI 层禁运行时 import hubClient，类型导入放行；与 #1463 互补（依赖图相反两侧） | | ||
| | Hub 客户端↔Hub router REST 契约 | #1467 | A#3 契约门禁（verify-shared-rest-contract.ps1，0 drift；Edge 面未纳入） | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Update the stale “七层” gate count.
After these additions, the table contains ten gate entries (Lines 25–34), while the section heading still says “七层.” Update the heading or define the grouping so the documented count matches the table.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/progress/MASTER.md` around lines 33 - 34, The progress section heading
still reports seven gates while the table now contains ten entries. Update the
heading in docs/progress/MASTER.md to reflect the table’s ten-entry count, or
explicitly define a grouping that makes the existing count accurate; keep all
gate rows unchanged.
| | 2026-07-29 | P2 收口：A#3 Hub 契约门禁合并（#1467 → master 6d3875cb；A#4/A#5 已在 #1463）。P3 裁决：8 项实测，D-V1 受 #867 硬阻塞 DEFER；D-V2/D-V3/A-V1/A-V3/A-V4 转 PLAN issue #1469–#1473；A-V5 已采纳 | | ||
| | 2026-07-29 | A-V2 澄清修正：非「由 #1463 覆盖」——p2 关门前补 A-V2 专属门禁 PR #1468（shared-UI 禁运行时 import hubClient，类型导入放行；与 #1463「平台↛共享Edge」是依赖图相反两侧的互补面，master 上 0 违规）。#1468 rebase 至最新 master 解 checks.yml/verify-ci-gates.ps1 加法冲突，本地 anti-cheat 通过，MERGEABLE 待 CI | | ||
| | 2026-07-29 | MASTER 同步：A-V2 澄清 + #1468 门禁入 14 层索引；live tip `6d3875cb`（#1467），#1468 待 CI 后合 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Resolve the conflicting live-tip commits.
The new session entries identify 6d3875cb as the live tip, but the document header still records master at 8915c1c6 on Line 14. Update one source of truth so readers can determine the actual current commit.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/progress/MASTER.md` around lines 100 - 102, Update the document’s
master/live-tip reference near the header, including the `8915c1c6` entry, to
match the current `6d3875cb` commit already recorded in the session entries.
Ensure the document has a single consistent source of truth for the current
master commit.
Add A#3 Hub<->router REST contract gate row (#1467) and a 2026-07-29 session-log entry for P2 closure + P3 adjudication.
Docs only, no code change.
Summary by CodeRabbit