Static username and password authentication added as a launcher option#286
Static username and password authentication added as a launcher option#286enriquedacostacambio wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
| package org.littleshoot.proxy.impl; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
not sure about this package.
|
Hi @enriquedacostacambio: First of all, thank you for your contribution! Personally I think the Launcher class should be a small example. I see the intention of LP as a framework and the concrete application should have to define its requirements in a Launcher. I'm unhappy too with the huge grown connection classes with its inherited design. A lot of parameters and modes. I'm dreaming of a loose coupled design like the pipeline/handler concept in Netty. @jekh: Any thoughts about hat? |
|
Hi @ganskef thanks for the reply! I understand your point, it makes sense. I guess i'm looking at it from my own use case perspective. I'm using the LP as a tool for testing in development (and qa) boxes, to make sure my app works well with proxies, but I don't deploy any proxy in the actual environment myself. |
Just that.
Usage: