Skip to content

Upgrade gcsio to 3.1.16#38419

Open
Abacn wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Abacn:gcs-client-3.0
Open

Upgrade gcsio to 3.1.16#38419
Abacn wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Abacn:gcs-client-3.0

Conversation

@Abacn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Abacn Abacn commented May 8, 2026

Fix #31896

Please add a meaningful description for your change here


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@Abacn Abacn force-pushed the gcs-client-3.0 branch from 5d8b2e6 to 94ba4ac Compare May 8, 2026 21:34
@Abacn Abacn marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2026 00:59
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request upgrades the gcsio library to version 3.1.16 to address issue #31896. The changes simplify the initialization of Google Cloud Storage clients by removing legacy reflection-based workarounds that were previously necessary for compatibility, and update existing test suites to align with the new library's API signatures.

Highlights

  • Dependency Upgrade: Upgraded the google_cloud_bigdataoss_version to 3.1.16 in the Gradle build configuration.
  • Refactoring GCS Integration: Removed complex reflection-based logic for constructing GoogleCloudStorageImpl in favor of the standard Builder pattern now supported in the upgraded library.
  • API Compatibility Updates: Updated GcsUtilV1 and associated tests to accommodate API changes in the new gcsio version, including method renames in GoogleCloudStorageReadOptions.
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request upgrades the google-cloud-bigdataoss dependency to version 3.1.16, which allows for the removal of reflection-based instantiation of GoogleCloudStorageImpl in favor of its new builder API. The changes also include updates to artifact IDs in the Gradle configuration and adjustments to method calls in GcsUtilTest.java to maintain compatibility. Review feedback suggests providing a descriptive error message when wrapping IOException in GcsUtilV1 and correcting the use of Mockito.mock() as a matcher in test stubbing to ensure proper test execution.

googleCloudStorage =
createGoogleCloudStorage(googleCloudStorageOptions, storageClient, credentials);
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Wrapping an IOException in a generic RuntimeException without a descriptive message makes debugging harder. It is recommended to provide context about the failure, similar to the error message used in the previous reflection-based implementation.

Suggested change
throw new RuntimeException(e);
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to create GoogleCloudStorage", e);

Comment on lines +196 to +199
Mockito.when(
googleCloudStorageMock.open(
Mockito.mock(StorageResourceId.class),
Mockito.mock(GoogleCloudStorageReadOptions.class)))
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using Mockito.mock() as an argument in a when() call is likely a mistake. This creates a new mock instance that will not match the objects passed during the actual execution of the test, causing the stub to return null (the default for Mockito) instead of the intended mock channel. You should use Mockito.any() or specific matchers instead.

Suggested change
Mockito.when(
googleCloudStorageMock.open(
Mockito.mock(StorageResourceId.class),
Mockito.mock(GoogleCloudStorageReadOptions.class)))
Mockito.when(
googleCloudStorageMock.open(
Mockito.any(StorageResourceId.class),
Mockito.any(GoogleCloudStorageReadOptions.class)))

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 9, 2026

Assigning reviewers:

R: @ahmedabu98 for label java.
R: @liferoad for label build.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Task]: Upgrade gcs-connector libraries to 3.x

1 participant