Fix K8s scaling and deletion issue if firewall rule is for ALL ports #12806
Codecov / codecov/project
succeeded
Mar 17, 2026 in 0s
16.25% (-0.01%) compared to 56dc119, passed because coverage increased by 0% when compared to adjusted base (16.25%)
View this Pull Request on Codecov
16.25% (-0.01%) compared to 56dc119, passed because coverage increased by 0% when compared to adjusted base (16.25%)
Details
Codecov Report
❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 16.25%. Comparing base (56dc119) to head (2311950).
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| ...er/actionworkers/KubernetesClusterScaleWorker.java | 0.00% | 4 Missing |
| ...KubernetesClusterResourceModifierActionWorker.java | 0.00% | 1 Missing |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #12806 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.25% 16.25% -0.01%
+ Complexity 13425 13424 -1
============================================
Files 5662 5662
Lines 500167 500169 +2
Branches 60740 60740
============================================
Hits 81318 81318
- Misses 409763 409765 +2
Partials 9086 9086 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
- ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
Loading