Skip to content

[hotfix][ci] Do not run GHA nightly if there is no newer commits since the last run#28348

Open
snuyanzin wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
snuyanzin:nightly
Open

[hotfix][ci] Do not run GHA nightly if there is no newer commits since the last run#28348
snuyanzin wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
snuyanzin:nightly

Conversation

@snuyanzin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

The PR makes nightly running only if there are new commits since previous run.
If there is no new commits it will not run.
This is will allow to reduce GHA usage since Apache Infra is not happy with current usage

Brief change log

GHA

Verifying this change

GHA

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): ( no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): ( no)
  • The serializers: ( no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): ( no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: ( no )
  • The S3 file system connector: ( no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? ( no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable )

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes (please specify the tool below)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jun 7, 2026

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Comment on lines +54 to +55
// if it is same, then no need to run nightly for the same SHA again.
const { data: runsData } = await github.rest.actions.listWorkflowRuns({
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless the nightly previously failed I guess? Then I think we'd like to run it again?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this probably makes sense
initially I thought to skip it anyway, however on the other side it might help with flaky tests
added such condition as well

@snuyanzin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@flinkbot run azure

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants