HIVE-29705: Remediate critical CVEs in hive-druid-handler (HIVE-25013)#6589
Open
saihemanth-cloudera wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
HIVE-29705: Remediate critical CVEs in hive-druid-handler (HIVE-25013)#6589saihemanth-cloudera wants to merge 1 commit into
saihemanth-cloudera wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Replace Druid's Netty 3 HTTP client with Apache HttpClient to remove
io.netty:netty 3.x from the shaded druid-handler JAR (CVE-2019-20444).
Force patched async-http-client 2.15.0 and Jackson 2.18.8 into the shade,
bump platform Netty 4 to 4.1.133.Final, and make hive-druid-handler opt-in
via the druid-handler packaging profile so default distributions avoid
legacy transitive CVEs.
Why are the changes needed?
Avoid CVEs
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests