Conversation
gnodet
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2026
gnodet
left a comment
gnodet
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review — Javadoc Cleanup
Clean removal of redundant inline javadoc comments from RequestResult.java record components. The class-level javadoc already documents all three components (request, result, error) via @param tags, so no documentation is lost. The single-line record declaration is cleaner. ✅
No issues found.
This review was generated by an AI agent and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify all suggestions before applying.
Claude Code on behalf of Guillaume Nodet
gnodet
added a commit
to gnodet/maven
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2026
Reviewed new PR apache#12463 (remove dangling javadoc). APPROVE. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are parameters, not fields. javadoc doesn't work here