[Hackathon] feat: Reproducibility Validation for Workflow Versions#5102
Draft
SarahAsad23 wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
[Hackathon] feat: Reproducibility Validation for Workflow Versions#5102SarahAsad23 wants to merge 4 commits into
SarahAsad23 wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5102 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 42.75% 42.76%
- Complexity 2197 2206 +9
==========================================
Files 1045 1045
Lines 40094 40258 +164
Branches 4232 4254 +22
==========================================
+ Hits 17143 17217 +74
- Misses 21887 21969 +82
- Partials 1064 1072 +8
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR introduces a framework for comparing different versions of a workflow execution to help identify where executions begin to diverge. The goal of this project is to improve workflow reproducibility and debugging by making it easier to detect differences across workflow versions, operator outputs, and intermediate states.
The system allows workflow executions to be run side-by-side and analyzed for inconsistencies throughout execution rather than only comparing final outputs.
0516.1.mp4
Motivation
As workflows evolve over time, even small changes to operators, dependencies, configurations, or execution environments can lead to unexpected differences in results. Currently, it can be difficult to determine exactly where two workflow executions stop behaving the same way.
This project explores the idea of execution-level differencing for workflows by introducing tooling to:
Features