fix(workflows): use continue instead of break in close-labeler loop

[moosairfaan]

Fixes #41983
The close-labeler loop used break instead of continue, so any qualifying (Bug/Enhancement) issue that came after a non-qualifying one in a PR's closing issues list never got the QA label. Changed break to continue so the loop skips non-qualifying issues instead of aborting.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved automated labeling so all eligible referenced issues are processed.
  • Issues meeting the required criteria now receive the appropriate QA label without being skipped due to earlier non-matching issues.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3efa7b15-ab70-462f-8d8b-a79bf140b608

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 315b36c and 6f9932b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/close-labeler.yml

---

Walkthrough

The close-labeler workflow now skips non-matching issue references and continues evaluating subsequent nodes, allowing all eligible issues to receive the QA label.

Changes

Close labeler behavior

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Process all eligible issue references .github/workflows/close-labeler.yml	The loop uses continue for non-matching nodes instead of stopping with break.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related issues

• appsmithorg/appsmith#41983 — Describes the same break to continue change in the close-labeler workflow.

Suggested reviewers: mohanarpit

Poem

One issue missed, then onward it flies,
The loop keeps sailing through issue skies.
Matching bugs and features align,
QA labels bloom in a tidy line.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the main change: switching the close-labeler loop from break to continue.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description includes the issue reference and a clear change summary, but omits the template's automation and communication sections.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}