Skip to content

CELDEV-1304 - open celements package#541

Open
fpichler wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
CELDEV-1304-open-celements-package
Open

CELDEV-1304 - open celements package#541
fpichler wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
CELDEV-1304-open-celements-package

Conversation

@fpichler

@fpichler fpichler commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Renames the admin frontend package to the scoped package name @open-celements/admin
  • Marks the package as publishable by setting private to false
  • Adds an exports entry for ./src/* so source modules can be imported from the package

@fpichler fpichler requested a review from msladek June 3, 2026 14:27
@fpichler fpichler changed the base branch from dev to CELDEV-1304 June 3, 2026 14:28
Base automatically changed from CELDEV-1304 to dev June 7, 2026 22:53
@fpichler fpichler closed this Jun 8, 2026
@fpichler fpichler force-pushed the CELDEV-1304-open-celements-package branch from 83d29b7 to 163a9ce Compare June 8, 2026 21:58
@fpichler fpichler reopened this Jun 8, 2026
"not dead"
]
}
} No newline at end of file

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing eol@eof

Comment thread celements-webapp/pom.xml
<arguments>run build</arguments>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don’t think celements-webapp should enforce ../celements-admin-frontend in its maven lifecycle. these are separate deployables, so they should be built as distinct stages with their own artifacts. if we want a product-level quality gate, we should introduce an overall root-level celements-web build/job that fails if either fails.

is there a specific reason this needs to happen inside the war/webapp maven lifecycle?

@msladek msladek assigned fpichler and unassigned msladek Jun 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants