Skip to content

[Snyk] Upgrade body-parser from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0#64

Open
shafeeqd959 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-upgrade-a8bce7d14ab8bceda9cd97e585079cf2
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade body-parser from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0#64
shafeeqd959 wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-upgrade-a8bce7d14ab8bceda9cd97e585079cf2

Conversation

@shafeeqd959

@shafeeqd959 shafeeqd959 commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.

  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago.

Breaking Change Risk

Merge Risk: Medium

Notice: This assessment is enhanced by AI.

Release notes
Package name: body-parser from body-parser GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

@snyk-bot
fix: upgrade body-parser from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0
5f22b6e 
Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 2.2.2 to 2.3.0.

See this package in npm:
body-parser

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/contentstack-devex/project/b0db0c80-723c-4ad3-8500-1f3a1fa99974?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@shafeeqd959 shafeeqd959 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 7, 2026 05:56
@shafeeqd959

shafeeqd959 commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Merge Risk: Medium

This minor version upgrade introduces a potentially breaking behavioral change related to input validation.

Key Change:

  • Stricter limit option validation: Invalid values for the limit option (e.g., unparseable strings or NaN) will now throw an error. Previously, these values were silently ignored, which had the side effect of disabling request size limit enforcement. Passing null or undefined will now correctly fall back to the default limit.

Impact:
If your application is configured with an invalid limit value, it will begin to throw errors after this upgrade. This change makes the parser safer by default but may require code changes if you were unintentionally relying on the old behavior.

Source: GitHub HISTORY.md

Recommendation:
Verify any body-parser configurations to ensure the limit option is a valid number or string that can be parsed by the bytes library.

Notice 🤖: This content was augmented using artificial intelligence. AI-generated content may contain errors and should be reviewed for accuracy before use.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@shafeeqd959 @snyk-bot