Add option --exclude to audit-translations - #701
Conversation
60c9ea0 to
0215015
Compare
|
sounds good to me. @TimArborealis @AndersEkl what do you think? @michaldziwisz what is One idea would be to use |
|
and an edge case we might want to to avoid: it doesn't make sense to use both |
|
@moritz-gross wrote:
Sorry, I have added that while I was implementing this feature, I can remove it. I am ok with installing it ad-hoc. @moritz-gross wrote:
Yes, these two options should be mutually exclusive. I will implement the change now. |
|
@moritz-gross wrote:
... and to answer your question, |
0215015 to
25e1b0d
Compare
|
I have made some changes and squashed them:
Non-existing file names passed to
|
|
looks great, I think we're nearly done. we should add a regression test for this:
Do you want to, or should? thx for catching this. and we need a small fix on uv run audit-translations instead of uv audit-translations in the docs after this, we're ready I think |
25e1b0d to
67cc546
Compare
Hello, I am going over the instructions for validating new translations and I have found useful to add an
--excludeoption toaudit-translations.This option allow excluding specific files from the audit. In a sense, it does the opposite of what
--filedoes, but--filecan be used to specify only a single file.I have added the following examples in the
README.md: