Simplify all-zero or all-one constants in bitand/bitor

[tautschnig]

all-zeros in bitand yields zero, all-ones in bitor yield all-ones.

• Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
• n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
• n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
• Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
• n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
• My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
• n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Adds simplification rules for bitwise operations involving all-zero/all-one constants, plus new regression tests around expression simplification.

Changes:

• Simplify bitand to zero when any operand is an all-zero bitvector constant.
• Simplify bitor to all-ones when any operand is an all-ones constant.
• Add unit tests for bitand/all-zero and a few other simplify rules.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.

File	Description
src/util/simplify_expr_int.cpp	Implements early-return simplifications for bitand with all-zeros and bitor with all-ones.
unit/util/simplify_expr.cpp	Adds new simplification regression tests, including all-zero in bitand.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.48%. Comparing base (c740a89) to head (6e0af33).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8944      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    80.47%   80.48%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files         1704     1704              
  Lines       188702   188749      +47     
  Branches        73       73              
===========================================
+ Hits        151854   151911      +57     
+ Misses       36848    36838      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[kroening]

We've got all_zeros_expr() and all_ones_expr(). In particular, from_integer will fail on bv_typet, which has no numerical interpretation.

[tautschnig]

We've got all_zeros_expr() and all_ones_expr(). In particular, from_integer will fail on bv_typet, which has no numerical interpretation.

Done and included an additional test for the possibly-failing case.

[kroening]

You don't need the op.is_constant()

[tautschnig]

Fixed (in both places).