-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Fix undici usage on node 26 (alternate to #53) #54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
applesnort
wants to merge
11
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/undici-consistent-fetch
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7b0e77
Use native fetch when the runtime undici is compatible.
applesnort 44223a7
Test the undici-compatibility fix on Node.js 26 in CI.
applesnort 03f2b26
Read undici's package.json via an import attribute; fix stale comment.
applesnort 949ad09
Delegate Request-to-init conversion to undici's own Request constructor.
applesnort 62cd8e9
Use version independent text in comment.
davidlehn f465606
Simplify code flow.
davidlehn 67a4028
Clarify installed vs built-in undici terminology.
davidlehn 8e748b7
Split the undici compatibility comment by concern.
davidlehn 68b237c
Use "platform" instead of "built-in" for node's own undici.
davidlehn eb04772
Change pending release version.
davidlehn 0b50fa7
Update minor dependencies.
davidlehn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This wasn't done previously (
fetchhad to be passed) ... but maybe this works now?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
claude had a long winded run of tests and explanation summarized as "Confirmed — works now. On node 22 convertAgent returns only {dispatcher} and the self-signed HTTPS tests pass; without the dispatcher the same request fails with DEPTH_ZERO_SELF_SIGNED_CERT, so the option is definitely reaching fetch. The custom fetch is only needed on the major-mismatch path."