Revise Docker Hacking course summary and modules - #5
Conversation
Updated course summary to reflect new structure and content.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The documentation changes look good. The PR successfully transforms the course summary from an internal draft document to a user-facing reference by removing editorial notes and adding a clear module listing. The warning about intentional vulnerabilities is appropriate for a security testing lab. No blocking issues identified.
You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟢 Approval recommended
The only finding is a non-blocking nit about aligning the module list with repository contents.
Pull request overview
Updates COURSE_SUMMARY.md with revised Docker Hacking course branding, an isolation warning, and a module outline.
Changes:
- Reframes the course overview.
- Adds a safety warning.
- Lists the course modules.
File summaries
| File | Summary |
|---|---|
COURSE_SUMMARY.md |
Revised course branding, warning, and module listing. |
Review details
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 1
- Review effort level: Lite
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e6ac97fb37
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Updated course summary to reflect new structure and content.