Resolve merge conflicts for PR #4300

[kailando]

Reasons for making this change

I was looking around the open PRs and #4300 caught my eye: "Update Python.gitignore for tempCodeRunnerFile.py"

Links to documentation supporting these rule changes

formulahendry/vscode-code-runner#305

Merge and Approval Steps

• [v] Confirm that you've read the contribution guidelines and ensured your PR aligns
• Ensure CI is passing
• Get a review and Approval from one of the maintainers

[kailando]

Sorry, I was just seeing if I could make an old merge-conflicted PR work out. Not trying to come off rude or passive aggressive. Thank you for your time.

…

On Sun, Feb 22, 2026, 11:01 PM Zero Merge Conflicts < ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request. Review Feedback Thanks for taking the time to submit this PR. However, the changes introduced here appear to be highly specific to your own use case and don’t provide clear value to the broader user base or the project as a whole. Contributions should ideally benefit a wider audience or align with the general goals of the repository. To keep the codebase clean and maintainable, I’d suggest avoiding PRs that are narrowly scoped to individual preferences unless they are configurable or broadly applicable. Given this, I recommend closing this PR. Feel free to revisit with changes that can benefit more users or open a discussion beforehand to align on the direction. Thanks for understanding. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4791 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWUL3J4HWMSUMBZUG2L5KYD4NKCTDAVCNFSM6AAAAACS27T77SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTQMZZGE2TIOJZGA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ZeroMergeConflicts]

Thank you for your reply — I understand your perspective now. I’ll go ahead and hide my review to avoid any confusion. Also, if my previous comments came across as harsh or caused any discomfort, I sincerely apologize. That wasn’t my intention, and I understand how it can feel. Appreciate your understanding.

…

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026, 11:00 AM kailando ***@***.***> wrote: *kailando* left a comment (github/gitignore#4791) <#4791 (comment)> Sorry, I was just seeing if I could make an old merge-conflicted PR work out. Not trying to come off rude or passive aggressive. Thank you for your time. On Sun, Feb 22, 2026, 11:01 PM Zero Merge Conflicts < ***@***.***> wrote: > ***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request. > Review Feedback > > Thanks for taking the time to submit this PR. > > However, the changes introduced here appear to be highly specific to your > own use case and don’t provide clear value to the broader user base or the > project as a whole. Contributions should ideally benefit a wider audience > or align with the general goals of the repository. > > To keep the codebase clean and maintainable, I’d suggest avoiding PRs that > are narrowly scoped to individual preferences unless they are configurable > or broadly applicable. > > Given this, I recommend closing this PR. Feel free to revisit with changes > that can benefit more users or open a discussion beforehand to align on the > direction. > > Thanks for understanding. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > < #4791 (review)>, > or unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWUL3J4HWMSUMBZUG2L5KYD4NKCTDAVCNFSM6AAAAACS27T77SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZTQMZZGE2TIOJZGA> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4791 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/B2FE5EVS4KOUS7CXLN22RH34NKF57AVCNFSM6AAAAACS27T77SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTSNBSG4ZDQOBUGE> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[wirecat]

Thank you for your contribution!