BE-523: HashQL: Suspendable interpreter with structured values and input system by indietyp · Pull Request #8675 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-04-29T14:14:49Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Rework the MIR interpreter to support suspend/resume execution, richer value representations, and a proper input system. Together these let the interpreter pause when it needs external data (e.g. a database query), hand back a structured description of what it needs, and resume once the caller provides the result.

🔍 What does this change?

Suspension model (interpret/suspension/)

Introduce a suspend/resume protocol: when the interpreter hits a GraphRead terminator it yields a Suspension instead of blocking. Callers drive a start/resume loop until they get a Return.
GraphReadSuspension extracts temporal axes, filter parameters, and entity type from the suspended state.
Continuation carries the response value that resumes execution.
TemporalAxesInterval / Timestamp give structured representations of the temporal query window.
Runtime::run convenience wrapper for callers that can fulfill suspensions synchronously.

Input system (interpret/inputs.rs)

Add Inputs<'heap, A>: a typed map from interned symbols to Values, consulted for InputOp::Load and InputOp::Exists. Replaces the unstructured FastHashMap previously threaded through the runtime. Supports both global and custom allocators.

Value representation (interpret/value/)

Int: carry bit-width (1-bit boolean vs 128-bit integer) so serialization can distinguish true/false from 0/1 without external type info. Arithmetic promotes to 128-bit; bitwise boolean ops preserve 1-bit.
Struct: add StructBuilder<N> for stack-allocated fixed-field construction. Enforce sorted field invariant. Add merge and project_by_name.
Minor improvements to Opaque, List allocator parameterization, Str display.

SSA repair fix (pass/transform/ssa_repair)

Fix block parameters not being renamed during SSA repair.
Extend use-before-def detection to terminators, not just statements.

Entity path type resolution (pass/execution/traversal)

Add field_path and resolve_type to EntityPath for navigating from an entity path (e.g. WebId, Properties) to its concrete stdlib type.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

None

🐾 Next steps

The orchestrator in hashql-eval consumes the suspension model and input system introduced here.

🛡 What tests cover this?

Interpreter unit tests (interpret/tests.rs): cover the suspend/resume loop, input resolution, and value operations.
SSA repair UI tests (tests/ui/pass/ssa_repair): cover the block parameter and terminator fixes.
Existing pass UI tests re-blessed for snapshot changes from the Int representation change.

❓ How to test this?

cargo nextest run --package hashql-mir
cargo test --package hashql-mir --doc

feat: make Int size aware feat: postgres serialization feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: errors feat: psql codec feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: move bridge -> orchestrator feat: move bridge -> orchestrator feat: organize the runtime a bit more feat: organize the runtime a bit more feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: checkpoint feat: organize the runtime a bit more feat: finish orchestrator first version feat: finish orchestrator first version feat: feat: move out suspension requests to own module chore: clippy feat: split out into more manageable functions feat: split out into more manageable functions chore: orchestrator docs feat: organize the runtime a bit more feat: test orchestrator feat: better symbol repr feat: orchestrator test harness feat: orchestrator test harness feat: orchestrator test harness feat: orchestrator test harness feat: orchestrator test harness feat: test orchestrator feat: pipeline feat: bless snapshots chore: tests chore: masking chore: tests fix: SSA repair chiore: ssa repair snapshots feat: orchestrator test harness chore: remove spec fix: library features chore: update snapshots chore: update docs

cursor · 2026-04-29T14:14:58Z

PR Summary

High Risk
High risk because it substantially refactors the interpreter runtime API and execution model (new yield/suspension/continuation flow) and changes core value semantics (Int now tracks bool vs integer width), which can affect query execution and serialized results.

Overview
Adds a suspend/resume execution protocol to the MIR interpreter: GraphRead no longer unimplemented!(); execution now yields Yield::{Return,Suspension} with new Suspension/Continuation types and Runtime::{start,resume,run_until_suspension,run_until_transition} APIs, plus expanded diagnostics to categorize suspension-related failures.

Replaces ad-hoc input plumbing and adjusts runtime/value internals: introduces Inputs as the runtime input container (passed by reference), updates benches/tests accordingly, and expands interpreter error/value handling (new RuntimeError variants, projection through Opaque, StructBuilder, Str debug, list indexing conversion). Separately, Int is redesigned to track 1-bit booleans vs 128-bit integers, updating Postgres eval constant compilation and rebasing UI snapshots from 0/1 to false/true where appropriate.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 43cd799. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

vercel · 2026-04-29T14:15:00Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 19, 2026 3:53pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	May 19, 2026 3:53pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 19, 2026 3:53pm

indietyp · 2026-04-29T14:15:43Z

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

codecov · 2026-04-29T14:18:01Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 78.51750% with 313 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.90%. Comparing base (56860d0) to head (43cd799).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../hashql/mir/src/pass/execution/traversal/entity.rs	0.00%	66 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/error.rs	11.42%	62 Missing ⚠️
.../hashql/mir/src/interpret/suspension/graph_read.rs	47.19%	40 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/runtime.rs	79.25%	38 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/value/int.rs	91.96%	14 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/value/mod.rs	67.27%	18 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/inputs.rs	63.04%	17 Missing ⚠️
libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/tests.rs	96.08%	7 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
...bs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/value/struct.rs	96.15%	5 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...bs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/value/opaque.rs	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️
... and 7 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8675      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.72%   62.90%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files        1363     1369       +6     
  Lines      139062   140714    +1652     
  Branches     5818     5833      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        87225    88510    +1285     
- Misses      50921    51273     +352     
- Partials      916      931      +15

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.17% <ø> (-0.27%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <100.00%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
rust.hashql-eval	`81.08% <0.00%> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`91.58% <78.48%> (-0.51%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4082a24. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-05-19T17:15:08Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.847 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.916 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.800 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.993 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$65.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$412 \mathrm{ms} \pm 721 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$320 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.637 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.917 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.156 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$94.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 482 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.678 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 473 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 495 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 624 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.876 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 584 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 561 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$144 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$152 \mathrm{ms} \pm 584 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}83.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$592 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

indietyp added 3 commits April 29, 2026 16:10

chore: backport u32

7f1eced

chore: backport labels length

8a6ccb2

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp Apr 29, 2026

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 29, 2026 14:14 Inactive

github-actions Bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests labels Apr 29, 2026

indietyp changed the title ~~HashQL: Suspendable interpreter with structured values and input system~~ BE-523: HashQL: Suspendable interpreter with structured values and input system Apr 29, 2026

indietyp mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2026

BE-522: HashQL: Expand stdlib type system with temporal types #8674

Merged

chore: remove unused todo

a12b358

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut April 29, 2026 14:18 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 8, 2026 08:37 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 8, 2026 08:46 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from 7be336d to e2fda5b Compare May 11, 2026 10:58

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 11, 2026 11:01 View deployment

vercel Bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash May 11, 2026 11:02 Failure

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-522-hashql-expand-stdlib-type-definitions branch from 3cb3bf5 to dd10bcf Compare May 12, 2026 13:58

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from e2fda5b to 50368b6 Compare May 12, 2026 13:58

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 12, 2026 14:02 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 12, 2026 14:11 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-522-hashql-expand-stdlib-type-definitions branch from dd10bcf to ffd9997 Compare May 13, 2026 09:38

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from 50368b6 to 6499ac2 Compare May 13, 2026 09:38

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 13, 2026 09:42 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 13, 2026 09:50 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from 6499ac2 to d005e5a Compare May 13, 2026 09:57

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 13, 2026 10:01 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 13, 2026 10:08 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-522-hashql-expand-stdlib-type-definitions branch from 89ae7c2 to 9047680 Compare May 15, 2026 07:49

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from d005e5a to 4082a24 Compare May 15, 2026 07:49

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 15, 2026 07:53 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 15, 2026 07:57 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed May 15, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/hashql/mir/src/interpret/tests.rs

graphite-app Bot changed the base branch from bm/be-522-hashql-expand-stdlib-type-definitions to graphite-base/8675 May 18, 2026 08:45

indietyp force-pushed the graphite-base/8675 branch from 9047680 to a474018 Compare May 19, 2026 15:43

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and branch from 4082a24 to 43cd799 Compare May 19, 2026 15:43

indietyp changed the base branch from graphite-base/8675 to main May 19, 2026 15:43

indietyp requested review from TimDiekmann and thehabbos007 May 19, 2026 15:44

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 19, 2026 15:47 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 19, 2026 15:53 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

BE-523: HashQL: Suspendable interpreter with structured values and input system#8675

BE-523: HashQL: Suspendable interpreter with structured values and input system#8675
indietyp wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
bm/be-523-hashql-suspendable-interpreter-with-structured-values-and

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 19, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 19, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

indietyp commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Apr 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading