Update GitHub Action `aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials` to v6 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #9135 · hashintel/hash

chore(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.27.4 to 0.28.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1722
chore(deps-dev): bump @types/node from 25.5.0 to 25.5.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #1723
chore(deps-dev): bump @smithy/property-provider from 4.2.12 to 4.2.13 by @dependabot[bot] in #1724
chore(deps): bump proxy-agent from 8.0.0 to 8.0.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #1726
chore(deps): bump @smithy/node-http-handler from 4.5.1 to 4.5.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #1725
chore(deps): bump @aws-sdk/client-sts from 3.1020.0 to 3.1025.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1727
chore(deps): bump basic-ftp from 5.2.0 to 5.2.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #1728
chore(deps): bump basic-ftp from 5.2.1 to 5.2.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #1729
chore(deps-dev): bump @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1730
chore(deps-dev): bump @aws-sdk/credential-provider-env from 3.972.24 to 3.972.25 by @dependabot[bot] in #1733
chore(deps): bump @aws-sdk/client-sts from 3.1025.0 to 3.1030.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1732
chore(deps-dev): bump @biomejs/biome from 2.4.10 to 2.4.11 by @dependabot[bot] in #1734
chore(deps): bump basic-ftp from 5.2.2 to 5.3.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1736
chore(deps-dev): bump memfs from 4.57.1 to 4.57.2 by @dependabot[bot] in #1737
chore(deps-dev): bump typescript from 6.0.2 to 6.0.3 by @dependabot[bot] in #1740
chore(deps-dev): bump @smithy/property-provider from 4.2.13 to 4.2.14 by @dependabot[bot] in #1741
chore(deps-dev): bump @aws-sdk/credential-provider-env from 3.972.25 to 3.972.28 by @dependabot[bot] in #1742
chore(deps): bump @aws-sdk/client-sts from 3.1030.0 to 3.1033.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1743
chore(deps-dev): bump @biomejs/biome from 2.4.11 to 2.4.12 by @dependabot[bot] in #1739
chore(deps-dev): bump @biomejs/biome from 2.4.12 to 2.4.13 by @dependabot[bot] in #1747
chore(deps): bump postcss from 8.5.6 to 8.5.12 by @dependabot[bot] in #1752
chore(deps): bump @smithy/node-http-handler from 4.6.0 to 4.6.1 by @dependabot[bot] in #1750
chore(deps-dev): bump @aws-sdk/credential-provider-env from 3.972.28 to 3.972.32 by @dependabot[bot] in #1751
chore(deps): bump @aws-sdk/client-sts from 3.1033.0 to 3.1038.0 by @dependabot[bot] in #1749
chore: release 6.1.1 by @lehmanmj in #1757

Full Changelog: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v6...v6.1.1

`v6.1.0`

Compare Source

Features

add skip cleanup option (#1716) (11b1c58), closes #1545
Support usage of AWS Profiles (#1696) (a7f0c82)

`v6.0.0`

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

Update action to use node24 Note this requires GitHub action runner version v2.327.1 or later (#1632) (a7a2c11)

Features

add support to define transitive tag keys (#1316) (232435c) (930ebd9)

Bug Fixes

properly output aws-account-id and authenticated-arn when using role-chaining (#1633) (7ceaf96)

`v6`

Compare Source

`v5.1.1`

Compare Source

Miscellaneous Chores

release 5.1.1 (56d6a58)
various dependency updates

`v5.1.0`

Compare Source

Features

Add global timeout support (#1487) (1584b8b)
add no-proxy support (#1482) (dde9b22)
Improve debug logging in retry logic (#1485) (97ef425)

Bug Fixes

properly expose getProxyForUrl (introduced in #1482) (#1486) (cea4298)

`v5.0.0`

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

Cleanup input handling. Changes invalid boolean input behavior (see #1445)

Features

add skip OIDC option (#1458) (8c45f6b)
Cleanup input handling. Changes invalid boolean input behavior (see #1445) (74b3e27)
support account id allowlist (#1456) (c4be498)

`v5`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 2am on saturday"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate.

vercel · 2026-08-01T00:55:52Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 12:55am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 12:55am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Aug 1, 2026 12:55am

cursor · 2026-08-01T00:55:53Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major-version bump on the action that assumes IAM roles for ECR pushes and ECS redeploys; inputs are the same but v6 auth/runtime changes could break CD if incompatible with your runners.

Overview
Bumps aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials from v4.3.1 to v6.2.2 (pinned SHA) in .github/workflows/deploy.yml at all three OIDC steps: ECR push during build, ECR push in stage, and ECS deploy in deploy. role-to-assume and aws-region inputs are unchanged.

This is a major action upgrade (v6 runs on Node 24 and needs a recent GitHub runner). If deploy workflows fail at the credential step after merge, runner compatibility or v6 auth behavior is the first place to check.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 118bbad. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

codecov · 2026-08-01T01:00:39Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.33%. Comparing base (8daf815) to head (118bbad).
⚠️ Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9135   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.32%   59.33%           
=======================================
  Files        1397     1397           
  Lines      135621   135638   +17     
  Branches     6295     6295           
=======================================
+ Hits        80462    80479   +17     
  Misses      54187    54187           
  Partials      972      972

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.99% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`10.51% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.49% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.55% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`10.02% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`3.07% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.89% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`7.41% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.59% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-embeddings	`91.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.04% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`38.71% <ø> (+0.21%)`	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`84.71% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`89.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.39% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`78.98% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`79.82% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.09% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`87.92% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.04% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-08-01T01:04:16Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x (118bbad) with main (fb8a6d1)¹}

No successful run was found on main (6afcaff) during the generation of this report, so fb8a6d1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

github-actions · 2026-08-01T02:20:44Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.048 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.999 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.365 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$34.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$282 \mathrm{ms} \pm 944 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$9.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.984 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 641 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$66.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.413 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$86.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.614 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 652 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 528 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$51.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.233 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 509 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 702 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.287 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 551 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.408 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$522 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update GitHub Action aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials to v6

118bbad

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge August 1, 2026 00:55

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Aug 1, 2026

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann Aug 1, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Update GitHub Action `aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials` to v6 - #9135

Update GitHub Action `aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials` to v6#9135
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/gha/aws-actions-configure-aws-credentials-6.x

hash-worker Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Release Notes

Miscellaneous Chores

Miscellaneous Chores

Bug Fixes

Features

Bug Fixes

Bug Fixes

Bug Fixes

What's Changed

Features

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

Features

Bug Fixes

Miscellaneous Chores

Features

Bug Fixes

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

Features

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

cursor Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Aug 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading