Skip to content

docs: add CI optimization analysis for pre-release builds#12207

Merged
vjgit96 merged 1 commit intorelease-1.9.0from
doc/ci-optimization-analysis
Apr 2, 2026
Merged

docs: add CI optimization analysis for pre-release builds#12207
vjgit96 merged 1 commit intorelease-1.9.0from
doc/ci-optimization-analysis

Conversation

@vjgit96
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@vjgit96 vjgit96 commented Mar 16, 2026

Summary

Analysis of CI performance bottleneck for pre-release builds (LE-517).

Problem

Pre-release builds (PyPI + Docker) require 45-60 minute CI wait, causing significant delays when urgent last minute testing is needed.

Analysis

  • Bottleneck identified: Both PyPI publishing and Docker builds wait for full CI suite
  • Time impact: 45-60 minutes of 87-112 total minutes (53-67% wasted waiting)
  • Cross-platform tests already validate: Installation, dependencies, server startup

Recommendation

Implement skip_ci parameter with safeguards:

  • Explicit opt-in (default: false)
  • Required justification
  • Team notifications
  • Audit trail

Key Findings

  • Cross-platform tests already catch critical issues (broken installation, missing dependencies)
  • Pre-releases are for finding issues - customers expect potential problems
  • 50% time savings (100 min → 50 min) for urgent scenarios
  • Risk is acceptable: ~10-15% chance of non-critical issues in pre-release context

Documentation

Full analysis in ci-skip-analysis.md including:

  • Detailed workflow analysis
  • Risk assessment
  • Implementation code examples
  • Usage guidelines
  • Success metrics

- Analyze 45-60 min CI bottleneck for pre-release builds
- Document that both PyPI publishing and Docker builds wait for CI
- Recommend skip_ci parameter with safeguards for urgent releases
- Show 50% time savings (100 min → 50 min) for pre-releases
- Include risk assessment and implementation guidelines

Addresses LE-517
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3bc6b80e-46ab-4b5b-bd9b-39e91d4ee1c3

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch doc/ci-optimization-analysis
📝 Coding Plan
  • Generate coding plan for human review comments

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Tip

CodeRabbit can use Trivy to scan for security misconfigurations and secrets in Infrastructure as Code files.

Add a .trivyignore file to your project to customize which findings Trivy reports.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 16, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Frontend Unit Test Coverage Report

Coverage Summary

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 24%
24.37% (8698/35681) 17.19% (4832/28095) 17.05% (1275/7474)

Unit Test Results

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
2783 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 46.955s ⏱️

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (release-1.9.0@68edb4a). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-1.9.0   #12207   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage                 ?   38.69%           
================================================
  Files                    ?     1633           
  Lines                    ?    80625           
  Branches                 ?    12156           
================================================
  Hits                     ?    31194           
  Misses                   ?    47654           
  Partials                 ?     1777           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 57.49% <ø> (?)
frontend 21.75% <ø> (?)
lfx 44.65% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Adam-Aghili Adam-Aghili left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I thik we should implment this

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Apr 2, 2026
@vjgit96 vjgit96 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 2, 2026
Merged via the queue into release-1.9.0 with commit b0a8662 Apr 2, 2026
92 checks passed
@vjgit96 vjgit96 deleted the doc/ci-optimization-analysis branch April 2, 2026 17:59
Adam-Aghili pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2026
- Analyze 45-60 min CI bottleneck for pre-release builds
- Document that both PyPI publishing and Docker builds wait for CI
- Recommend skip_ci parameter with safeguards for urgent releases
- Show 50% time savings (100 min → 50 min) for pre-releases
- Include risk assessment and implementation guidelines

Addresses LE-517
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants