Skip to content

feat(Combinatorics): Combinatorial interpretations of the Stirling numbers#211

Open
thomaskwaring wants to merge 5 commits into
leanprover:mainfrom
thomaskwaring:stirling
Open

feat(Combinatorics): Combinatorial interpretations of the Stirling numbers#211
thomaskwaring wants to merge 5 commits into
leanprover:mainfrom
thomaskwaring:stirling

Conversation

@thomaskwaring
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Prove that the Stirling numbers, defined in Mathlib by recursion, indeed count their associated combinatorial objects. While entirely elementary (on paper), this could be interesting as there is very little explicit (ie, counting the cardinality of some set or type) enumerative combinatorics in Mathlib.

Comment thread LeanEval/Combinatorics/Stirling.lean Outdated
@kim-em
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

kim-em commented May 15, 2026

@thomaskwaring

I'm inclined to believe these are too easy. How many LoC would you estimate for solutions here? I'm guessing <2000 to do this nicely, possibly less?

@thomaskwaring
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

that's fair, certainly <2000 maybe a lot less. it's a bit hard for me to judge the requirement "difficult for current frontier models" bc i haven't spent any time using them — i was comparing it to the Cayley graph problem but more than happy to defer to your judgement :)

Co-authored-by: Kim Morrison <477956+kim-em@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants