feat(Combinatorics): Combinatorial interpretations of the Stirling numbers#211
Open
thomaskwaring wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
feat(Combinatorics): Combinatorial interpretations of the Stirling numbers#211thomaskwaring wants to merge 5 commits into
thomaskwaring wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
kim-em
reviewed
May 15, 2026
Collaborator
|
I'm inclined to believe these are too easy. How many LoC would you estimate for solutions here? I'm guessing <2000 to do this nicely, possibly less? |
Author
|
that's fair, certainly <2000 maybe a lot less. it's a bit hard for me to judge the requirement "difficult for current frontier models" bc i haven't spent any time using them — i was comparing it to the Cayley graph problem but more than happy to defer to your judgement :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prove that the Stirling numbers, defined in Mathlib by recursion, indeed count their associated combinatorial objects. While entirely elementary (on paper), this could be interesting as there is very little explicit (ie, counting the cardinality of some set or type) enumerative combinatorics in Mathlib.