Probe: Stainless preview vs csharp-free base (throwaway)

[ls-bolt]

Claim this PR — take ownership under your GitHub account

Throwaway probe for the csharp preview investigation on #657 — do not review or merge.

Question: does builds.compare union the target set across base and head? On #657, the head config verifiably lacked the csharp target yet the server still built csharp — the suspected reason is that the base build (from the merge base = main, which still has csharp) forces csharp into the comparison.

Setup: this PR is based on 07-06-pan-embed-url-fetch-on-demand-docs (csharp-free config on both sides) and carries a doc-comment-only codegen delta (GtqAccountInfoBase.bankAccountType description) — the exact class of change proven to fail preview against a main base.

Read-out:

• preview green → union confirmed; the csharp removal in docs(cards): panEmbedUrl is nullable and minted only on GET /cards/{id} #657 fixes the check for all PRs once it reaches main.
• preview red on csharp → the target set persists server-side in Stainless Studio regardless of config; repo-side fixes are impossible and someone with Studio access must remove the target.

Will report the result on #657 and close this PR.

---

🤖 thundering-graviton(#2) | Feedback

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
grid-flow-builder	Ignored		Jul 7, 2026 1:39am
grid-wallet-demo	Ignored		Jul 7, 2026 1:39am

[github-actions]

✱ Stainless preview builds for grid

This PR will update the grid SDKs with the following commit messages.

cli

chore(internal): regenerate SDK with no functional changes

csharp

chore(internal): regenerate SDK with no functional changes

go

docs(types): clarify bank account type description in GTQ external account

kotlin

docs(api): update bankAccountType descriptions in account info models

openapi

docs(api): update bankAccountType field description

php

docs(types): update BankAccountType documentation

python

docs(types): update bank_account_type description in gtq_external_account_create_info

ruby

chore(internal): regenerate SDK with no functional changes

typescript

docs(types): clarify bankAccountType description in GTQ account types

Edit this comment to update them. They will appear in their respective SDK's changelogs.

✅ grid-openapi studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️

✅ grid-ruby studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

✅ grid-go studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ❗ → test ❗

go get github.com/stainless-sdks/grid-go@9f1e30be260d746d26fc9a054066f833563a5515

✅ grid-kotlin studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ✅ → lint ✅ → test ❗

✅ grid-typescript studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ❗ → test ✅

npm install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/grid-typescript/9da083062cb253fae84da289cf1fcb1ac74bb461/dist.tar.gz

✅ grid-python studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → build ✅ → lint ❗ → test ❗

pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/grid-python/92f8c0eb2a5a810e854d3328d57e9a73da817b96/grid-0.0.1-py3-none-any.whl

✅ grid-csharp studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ❗ → lint ✅ → test ❗

✅ grid-php studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "note" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ✅ → lint ✅ → test ✅

✅ grid-cli studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one "warning" diagnostic, but this did not represent a regression.
generate ⚠️ → build ⏭️ (prev: build ❗) → lint ⏭️ (prev: lint ❗) → test ❗

---

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-07-07 01:44:24 UTC

[ls-bolt]

Probe complete: preview PASSED (see #657 for the full verdict). csharp still built and its build CI still failed, but base failed identically → 'did not represent a regression' → green. Closing.