honour the tiff.subifd input option#4572
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for fixing this too! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tiff.subifd is silently ignored
The native input descriptor guards the sub-IFD read with
HasAttr(input, "subifd"), butlib/input.mjsonly ever sets thetiffSubifdproperty, so the guard never matches and the value keeps its-1default on the way to the libvips loader. Matched the guard to the read (which already usestiffSubifd) and added a regression test.