ci: separate object storage integration from coverage UT - #416
Closed
gouhongshen wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
ci: separate object storage integration from coverage UT#416gouhongshen wants to merge 2 commits into
gouhongshen wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Root cause
The coverage job exported
TEST_S3FS_ALIYUNandTEST_S3FS_QCLOUDbefore runninggo test -short ./.... MatrixOne's fileservice tests discovered those ambient variables and executed real cloud contract tests inside the unit-test process. A TCP timeout on the Tencent TKE runner's cross-cloud route to Aliyun OSS therefore failed an unrelated PR coverage check.The failed run reached no HTTP response: DNS resolved, but TCP connection establishment to the Aliyun endpoint timed out. Its rerun passed on a different ephemeral runner at the same commit, which rules out credentials and MatrixOne SDK behavior as the direct cause.
Changes
fail-fast: falseRollout
Merge this PR before the paired MatrixOne PR. The coverage change is independently compatible with current MatrixOne: without
TEST_S3FS_*, the existing fileservice suite uses local disk only. After the caller lands, relevant fileservice/dependency PRs run real provider integration before merge, while a daily run continues detecting provider or network drift.Related issue: matrixorigin/matrixone#26541.
Validation
actionlintv1.7.7 on both changed CI workflows and the paired MatrixOne caller; known custom-runner and existingjob.workflow_*false positives excludedgit diff --check