fix: upgrade Furo to 2025.12.19 to fix right panel highlight offset (#7019)#9049
fix: upgrade Furo to 2025.12.19 to fix right panel highlight offset (#7019)#9049rafaumeu wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
…st#7072) The file common-esr-support-rst.rst is designed to be included by multiple pages (releases-lifecycle.rst, version-archive.rst) but lacks the :orphan: and :nosearch: metadata. When accessed directly via URL, it displays '<no title>' in the browser tab and appears in site search results. Add :orphan: and :nosearch: directives to prevent it from being indexed or showing up in search, consistent with other included-only files like cloud-supported-integrations.rst and badge files.
…attermost#7019) The fixed notification banner breaks the right sidebar's scrollspy section detection because it doesn't account for sticky elements above the header. Furo PR mattermost#664 (released in 2025.07.19) fixes this by including header.top in the offset calculation. Upgrading from 2024.8.6 to 2025.12.19 includes this fix plus Sphinx 9 support and other improvements.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughBumps the ChangesFuro Dependency Upgrade
RST Orphan and Nosearch Directives
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@rafaumeu - Thank you for your contribution! Is there a dev you recommend we tag for the technical review on this one? |
|
@Combs7th I don't think this needs dev review, just thorough testing in the preview to ensure there are no regressions with the rhs table of contents and linking to sections |
| @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@ | |||
| :orphan: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rafaumeu this change looks unintended as it's covered in your other PR
|
Replaced by #9074 with a clean commit history — only the actual fix commit, no merge commits or upstream commits mixed in. |
Closing in favor of #9074 which has a clean commit history (only the actual fix commit, no merge commits or upstream commits).