Fix BEM solving tolerance#14071
Open
larsoner wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rhoendwas too tight -- it's within the numerical noise of the objective function minimum so on latest SciPy with newer PyPRIMA cobyla it just bounces around until maximum function evals (2000 I think?) hits, which takes about a second. This makes it take < 100 ms for the fit.rhobegandrhoendlimits, as well as solver choice (I had Claude investigate COBYQA and other solvers and rhobeg/rhoend, our choices are good!)Part of #14063. Investigated speedups and drafted changes using Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, then I revised (and understand + vouch for all changes).