Conversation
lwjohnst86
left a comment
lwjohnst86
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Neat
| +------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ | ||
| | Consequences X Likelihood | No or insignificant consequences | Inconvenient consequences | Critical consequences | Unacceptable consequences | | ||
| +============+============+============+============+============+ | ||
| | Unlikely | 1☐ | 2☐ | 3☐ | 4☐ | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't look too nice. What are those characters after the numbers? I think we can simplify this table into a simple "Not very likely, inconvenient consequences" text.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In Review
to In Progress
in Data development
lwjohnst86
left a comment
lwjohnst86
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Neat
| Prepared by: Kristiane Beicher | ||
|
|
||
| Last revised : 01-02-2026 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Last sentence could also be: Only information relevant to this project was retained.
|
|
||
| If yes, with whom? | ||
|
|
||
| Joint Data Controller: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
and if we do this for the whole study then the other partners should also be mentioned. You can find the JDA on sharepoint
danielibsen
left a comment
danielibsen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the main thing is to discuss if we want this to be for the entire study or only feasibility. I prefer for the entire thing. And then put AUH as data controller.
Co-authored-by: Luke W. Johnston <lwjohnst86@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Luke W. Johnston <lwjohnst86@users.noreply.github.com>
the last of the formatting changes applied Co-authored-by: Luke W. Johnston <lwjohnst86@users.noreply.github.com>
3 participants
Description
There are probably plenty of typos etc in here. I also need to create the two diagrams with colours at the end, and get the second section fleshed out.
Needs a quick review.
Checklist
just run-all