Skip to content

fix: django admin wasn't showing details of content libraries (#38578) [Verawood Backport]#38675

Open
MaferMazu wants to merge 1 commit into
openedx:release/verawoodfrom
eduNEXT:mfmz/cherry-pick-content-lib-fix-verawood
Open

fix: django admin wasn't showing details of content libraries (#38578) [Verawood Backport]#38675
MaferMazu wants to merge 1 commit into
openedx:release/verawoodfrom
eduNEXT:mfmz/cherry-pick-content-lib-fix-verawood

Conversation

@MaferMazu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MaferMazu MaferMazu commented May 28, 2026

Problem

When we enter the Verawood sandbox in the Django Admin and try to check a specific content library, the web returns a 500 error.

Link in Django Admin: https://verawood.demo.edly.io/admin/content_libraries/contentlibrary/
Link with the error 500: https://verawood.demo.edly.io/admin/content_libraries/contentlibrary/1/change/

You can test the error with the sandbox credentials: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1j1uDhVIVLwHUfrMLBzx6lM55gYL6i4nUqbzkbLHpaHQ/edit?usp=sharing

The problem was introduced in this PR #38297 when we removed the authorized_lti_configs field, and it was solved in #38578.

Description

This is a cherry-pick of #38578

Why this should be in Verawood

To not have that view broken. An admin user should be able to see their libraries in the model.

Notes

I tested in a verawood env and worked as expected. You can test it using this branch, and enter it in yourlms/admin/content_libraries/contentlibrary/1/change/ (you should be able to see the library details and not get a 500 error)

…x#38578)

FieldError at /admin/content_libraries/contentlibrary/:id/change/
Unknown field(s) (authorized_lti_configs)
@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label May 28, 2026
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the pull request, @MaferMazu!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-openedx-platform.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.
🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads
🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details
Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 moved this from Needs Triage to In Eng Review in Contributions Jun 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U

Projects

Status: In Eng Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants